Is there a need for 5 layer MEMS in Particle Physics Experimental Setups?

In summary, the conversation discusses the design of a MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) device with rotating plates coated with platinum and capable of rotating at high speeds with synchronous pulsed optical triggers. The device is transparent to infrared and has 4 layers. The conversation also mentions the potential for a 5-layer MEMS design software and fabrication system, which could provide increased flexibility in experiments involving physical stress. The conversation also touches on the potential applications of MEMS in accelerator and collider experiments, particularly in relation to gravity experiments and the study of relativity. The conversation ends with a call for input from physicists and researchers on the potential uses of MEMS in their fields.
  • #1
BenHastings
5
0
http://www.ua-kits.com/mems/ow_userfiles/themes/theme_image_1.jpg
Actual MEMS design drawing of rotating plate with sections coated with platinum intended to rotate greater than 350,000 rpm with synchronous pulsed optical triggers. The plate and supporting substrate is mostly transparent to infrared. This is a 4-layer device.​


I'm working with the MEMS University Alliance (MUA) and we have the opportunity to provide 5-layer MEMS design software and fabrication; MEMS is normally 2 maybe 3 layers. This will be the only system available for producing 5 layer MEMS devices.

This provides a great deal of increased flexibility in the design of experiments.

In Accellerator and Collider experiments, is there any need for placing an active target in some form of physical stress (linear/angular velocity/acceleration, centrifugal force, high speed differential femto gravitational fields, active optical windows, active reflectors, active samples, fluidics, biology related...) to derive some form of characterization? In accelerators, colliders...

The NSF has focused effort on gravity experiments and relating relativity.<link>

MEMS gears can rotate in excess of 350,000 rpm and lever systems have many billions of cycles of repeatable operation. Entire machine mechanisms can be created smaller than 1/2 the width of a hair or as large as the 6" wafer itself, and therefore can fit in most fixtures for experiments. The smallest feature clearance is 1 micrometer and the smallest shape feature is 50 nanometers.

Before the MEMS University Alliance commits common resources we would like to know what University departments and organizations/industries involved with national needs, would have the most intense interest in these advanced capabilities. We are not looking for funding, but if no one has the need, then we would be remiss to waste our resources?


I very much would appreciate related physicists and other related researchers to direct your associates here to comment and participate in discussion. I am trying not to be overactive on related technical/social networks so this will likely be one of a very few places to have influence in creating a MEMS 5-layer resource if they have an interest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I happen to think, are there any experimentalists here?

Theorists have no need to neutralize the effects of physical environments on experiemental outcomes to separate systems of influence.
 
  • #3
There are.

However, particle physics cares about interactions between single particles or nuclei only - and you cannot alter their properties with mechanical systems (in a significant way).

It might be useful for the infrastructure - particle detectors, particle sources, whatever. No idea there.
 

1. What is a 5 layer MEMS?

A 5 layer MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical System) is a microscale device that integrates mechanical and electrical components on a single chip. It typically consists of five layers of material, including a top, bottom, and three intermediate layers. These layers are etched and stacked on top of each other to create a functional device with precise movements and electrical connections.

2. How does a 5 layer MEMS work in particle physics experiments?

In particle physics experiments, 5 layer MEMS are used as sensors to detect and measure the properties of particles. They can be designed to detect different types of particles, such as photons, electrons, or protons, by using different materials and configurations. They can also be used to manipulate particles by applying electrical or mechanical forces through their layers.

3. What are the advantages of using 5 layer MEMS in particle physics experiments?

5 layer MEMS offer several advantages in particle physics experiments. They are small in size, which allows them to be placed in precise locations within the experimental setup. They also have high sensitivity and can detect very small changes in particle properties. Additionally, they can be mass-produced with consistent performance, making them cost-effective for large-scale experiments.

4. Are there any challenges in using 5 layer MEMS in particle physics experiments?

One of the main challenges in using 5 layer MEMS in particle physics experiments is their sensitivity to external disturbances, such as temperature changes or vibrations. These disturbances can affect the performance of the device and lead to inaccurate measurements. Therefore, careful design and shielding techniques are necessary to minimize these effects.

5. Can 5 layer MEMS be used in other scientific fields?

Yes, 5 layer MEMS have applications in various scientific fields, including biotechnology, aerospace, and telecommunications. They can be used as sensors, actuators, and switches in these fields, providing precise and reliable measurements and control. As technology advances, it is likely that 5 layer MEMS will continue to play a significant role in many scientific disciplines.

Similar threads

I How powerful would a collider have to be to observe a sphaleron?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Workforce Elements, Toolbox for QIS Programs at Universities
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
816
Other 2 years for MS Eng or Longer for MS Physics? Science Entrepreneur Qs
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
981
Admissions Need advice for my personal statement
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
27
Views
2K
I How credible are CKM matrix limits on new physics?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
Relative time in light of quantum entanglement experiments
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
3K
Cascade Tube Particle Accelerator
    • General Engineering
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • Poll
Astrophysics Physics Of Space Plasmas: An Introduction, 2nd Ed, by George Parks
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
4K
Is my summary of these subjects correct?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
735

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top