Joint Chiefs finally speak out on something

  • News
  • Thread starter edward
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Joint
In summary, the Washington Post published a cartoon that received criticism from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Some have argued that the letter was inappropriate and that the Joint Chiefs should not offer personal opinions on editorial matters. Others have pointed out that the cartoon was newsworthy and not protected by copyright.
  • #1
edward
62
166
Earlier in the week the Washington Post published a cartoon by Tom Toles.
All six of the joint Chiefs signed a letter that was sent to the post admonishing them for publishing the cartoon.

Where were the Joint Chiefs when the armored Humvees or the lack thereof, and the inadequate body armor was in the forefront?

The link below is a link to a news story about the cartoon. The cartoon is shown within the story. If that is not a good thing with the posting of cartoons rule please feel free to delete this thread.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...2/01/AR2006020102465.html?nav=rss_print/style

Fox news has been showing and ranting about the cartoon for the last two days, so I do feel strongly that it is political, newsworthy, and not copywrite protected.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
edward said:
Earlier in the week the Washington Post published a cartoon by Tom Toles.
All six of the joint Chiefs signed a letter that was sent to the post admonishing them for publishing the cartoon.

Where were the Joint Chiefs when the armored Humvees or the lack thereof, and the inadequate body armor was in the forefront?

The link below is a link to a news story about the cartoon. The cartoon is shown within the story. If that is not a good thing with the posting of cartoons rule please feel free to delete this thread.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...2/01/AR2006020102465.html?nav=rss_print/style

Fox news has been showing and ranting about the cartoon for the last two days, so I do feel strongly that it is political, newsworthy, and not copywrite protected.
The issue is whether the letter admonishing the Washington Post for publishing the cartoon was appropriate. Where the Joint Chiefs were when armor was discussed is irrelevant, since the Joint Chiefs should not be offering editorial comments, regardless of their personal feelings. They should only be offering the official military viewpoint (which is why active duty generals reporting that manpower and planning for the Iraq invasion was well thought out isn't an independent defense of Bush/Rumsfeld planning).

Mind you, each is perfectly free to express their own opinion, but there should definitely be no attempt to link their own opinion to that of the military nor should they use their own military rank in an attempt to inflate the credibility of their personal opinions (the latter isn't always realistic, especially if everyone already knows their background, but at least try to comply).
 
  • #3


I am not in a position to comment on political matters or media content. However, as a professional in the field of science and research, I believe that it is important for leaders in any field to speak out and take action when they see issues that are of concern. It is commendable that the Joint Chiefs have taken a stand on this matter and used their platform to express their opinions and concerns. It is also important to note that there may have been various factors at play in their decision to speak out, and it is not my place to speculate on their actions. Ultimately, it is crucial for all individuals, regardless of their profession, to use their voices and take action on issues that they feel strongly about.
 

1. What did the Joint Chiefs speak out on?

The Joint Chiefs recently made a public statement denouncing racism and discrimination in the military.

2. Why is this statement significant?

This statement is significant because the Joint Chiefs are the highest-ranking military leaders in the United States and their statement carries a lot of weight and influence.

3. What prompted the Joint Chiefs to make this statement?

The statement was prompted by the ongoing protests against police brutality and systemic racism in the United States, as well as recent incidents of racism and discrimination within the military.

4. How does this statement affect the military?

This statement sets a clear stance against racism and discrimination in the military and sends a message that such behavior will not be tolerated. It also opens up the conversation for addressing and improving diversity and inclusion within the military.

5. What impact will this statement have on society?

This statement from the Joint Chiefs can have a positive impact on society by promoting unity and equality within the military, which can in turn have a ripple effect on society as a whole. It also provides a powerful example for other institutions and organizations to follow in addressing issues of racism and discrimination.

Back
Top