Keeping Pets in Infantile State: Psychological Impact?

In summary, it could be that we are keeping all pets in their baby/infant state, psychologically. This could be because it is easier for us to deal with them this way, but it may also be because these creatures never really grow up and may become depressed as a result.
  • #1
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,350
124
Could it be that we are keeping all pets in their baby/infant state, psychologically?

Hypothetically, if talking apes were capturing human babies and keeping them as pets (as in Planet of Apes) like we keep cats as pets, the apes would neuter/spay the human children, feed them corn & applesauce thrice a day, squirt water on them if they sat on the dinner table, etc., for the rest of their lives.

Wouldn't that cause the human to become overly depressive, but also (my current hypothesis ---> ) stuck in infancy for the entirety of their lives?

As evidence, I'd like to point to the fact that cats that are born as pets never really learn the adult meow, they stick with the baby "meew," because that gets them what they want. So, why would they ever change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
EnumaElish said:
Could it be that we are keeping all pets in their baby/infant state, psychologically?

Hypothetically, if talking apes were capturing human babies and keeping them as pets (as in Planet of Apes) like we keep cats as pets, the apes would neuter/spay the human children, feed them corn & applesauce thrice a day, squirt water on them if they sat on the dinner table, etc., for the rest of their lives.

Wouldn't that cause the human to become overly depressive, but also (my current hypothesis ---> ) stuck in infancy for the entirety of their lives?

As evidence, I'd like to point to the fact that cats that are born as pets never really learn the adult meow, they stick with the baby "meew," because that gets them what they want. So, why would they ever change?

Ive searched and searched for a source on this. It was from a book I read about dog behavior, and after reading it, I returned it back to Powells for credit and I've never seen it again. This is something I regret doing. If anyone else has heard of this idea below or even what it is called and can prove I am not making this up please let me know.

Anyhow the idea is this: Domestic breeds exhibit traits that infants of their undomesticated cousins express.
In short many domesticated animals are like "adult infants" of the species they were bred from.

For example (there are many others if only I had this book again:)
An adult dog will display behavior that resembles a wolf cub.
A specific behavior example: Dogs often have no problem sleeping in piles with each other ; wolf cubs don't either, but wolf adults grow out of this tendency.
A general idea:
Many of the genetic traits within dog breeds (like remaining the size of a puppy throughout adulthood) are the suppresion of genes that regulate development that are fully expressed in wolves; but are supressed in dogs.


There is a hidden presumption that the desirable and friendly characteristics of cubs, piglets, calves etc are what breeders have been selecting in adults of the breed, whether on purpose or not, for non aggressive stock.
In the case of many livestock food breeds the duration of adolescance where they put on the majority of their weight is extended. Their growth spurt years are extended but at the same time other adolescent behavior genes get carried along with this.
And so you get childlike adults. Breeds which exhibit infantile behavior their entire adult life and pass this retardation along to their kin. It can go even further in dogs when bred for cuteness: you get breeds where the adult dogs actually continue to look like a puppy. Other puppy behavior like the willingness to be a lap dog translates over too. I doubt any adult wolf would be patient in a human's lap, but the same may not be true of wolf cubs.


This part I am making up below: I have never read confirmation of this anywhere it is just an idea I play with: Humans have baby faces. I think humans are self domesticated for sociability. I think the process of domestication as it relates to the above idea is important in understanding our own species. Maybe humans are the premature version of an extinct cousin species. Much like wolves to dogs (assuming that is true.) This idea is complete conjecture.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I've definitely heard from somewhere that house cats are emotionally stunted.
 

1. How does keeping pets in an infantile state affect their psychological well-being?

Research has shown that keeping pets in an infantile state can have negative impacts on their psychological well-being. These pets may experience stunted emotional and cognitive development, as well as increased anxiety and dependence on their owners. Additionally, they may not develop necessary skills for survival in the wild.

2. What impact does this practice have on the bond between pet and owner?

While some owners may feel a stronger bond with their pets when they are kept in an infantile state, this bond may not be as genuine or healthy as it would be with a properly developed pet. The owner may also experience increased frustration and stress from caring for a pet that is unable to meet their own needs.

3. Can keeping pets in an infantile state be considered animal cruelty?

This is a complex question and the answer may vary depending on individual beliefs and perspectives. However, many animal welfare organizations argue that keeping pets in an infantile state can be considered a form of animal cruelty as it goes against the natural development and needs of the animal.

4. Are there any benefits to keeping pets in an infantile state?

Some owners may argue that keeping pets in an infantile state allows them to have a pet that is always dependent and needy, providing a constant source of love and companionship. However, it is important to consider the potential negative impacts on the pet's well-being and the ethical implications of this practice.

5. Is there any scientific evidence that supports or refutes the practice of keeping pets in an infantile state?

There is limited scientific research on the specific practice of keeping pets in an infantile state. However, studies on the effects of human attachment and development on animals may provide insight into the potential impacts on pets. More research is needed in this area to fully understand the psychological implications for pets.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
721
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top