Lenses, diminished and magnified

  • Thread starter richnfg
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lenses
In summary: I shouldn't have doubted your experimental results! It seems I was using the midpoint between screen and object as the reference for measuring distances rather than the object location. I have corrected my first answer.Thank you for the clarification.
  • #1
richnfg
46
0
This is probably a stupidly easy question, but I'm confused so I need to ask about it. :smile:

I have this experiment I was doing where I have a light source at one end (which is enclosed in a casing and only let's light get out in the shape of an arrow because of an arrow shaped hole) and a screen at the other. In between is a lens and I move it to get the image of the arrow on the screen in focus. I notice I can get two points of focus, one where the arrow is diminished (smaller) and where it is magnified (larger).

Also, when I move the screen to 40cm from the light source I only seem to be able to get one in focus image, which I cannot decide is diminished or magnified.

I'm very confused as to why this happens, any help would be great.

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
richnfg said:
This is probably a stupidly easy question, but I'm confused so I need to ask about it. :smile:

I have this experiment I was doing where I have a light source at one end (which is enclosed in a casing and only let's light get out in the shape of an arrow because of an arrow shaped hole) and a screen at the other. In between is a lens and I move it to get the image of the arrow on the screen in focus. I notice I can get two points of focus, one where the arrow is diminished (smaller) and where it is magnified (larger).

Also, when I move the screen to 40cm from the light source I only seem to be able to get one in focus image, which I cannot decide is diminished or magnified.

I'm very confused as to why this happens, any help would be great.
Are you sure that you are keeping the lens and object fixed while you move only the screen?

For a given object distance and focal length, there is only one point at which the image will be in focus. That is determined by the lens equation:

[tex]\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i} [/tex]

Edit and correction:For a fixed screen to object distance, S, there will be two lens positions where the object is in focus provided S>4f. They will be:

[tex]o = S/2 \pm \frac{\sqrt{S^2 - 4Sf}}{2}[/tex]

If [itex]S = 4f[/itex] there will be only one solution. So I gather that your screen was 80 cm from the object and the lens has a focal length of 20 cm.

AM
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Andrew Mason said:
Are you sure that you are keeping the lens and object fixed while you move only the screen?

For a given object distance and focal length, there is only one point at which the image will be in focus. That is determined by the lens equation:

[tex]\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i} [/tex]

For a given screen to object distance, S = o + i, there will be at most one lens position where the object is in focus. That will be:

[tex]o = \frac{\sqrt{S^2 - 4Sf}}{2}[/tex]

AM

sorry, probabaly didnt explain very well...

object and screen kept the same then moving the lens. After I have found the two points of focus, move the screen then move the lens again.
 
  • #4
Start with

[tex]\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i} [/tex]

Suppose you've got the lens in one position that gives you an image on the screen. The lens is a distance [itex]o[/itex] from the object, and a distance [itex]i[/itex] from the image. The other position is the one that has the numbers for [itex]i[/itex] and [itex]o[/itex] switched around.

Exception: if [itex]i[/itex] and [itex]o[/itex] are equal, you don't change anything when you switch them around.
 
  • #5
richnfg said:
sorry, probabaly didnt explain very well...

object and screen kept the same then moving the lens. After I have found the two points of focus, move the screen then move the lens again.
Ok.
I shouldn't have doubted your experimental results! It seems I was using the midpoint between screen and object as the reference for measuring distances rather than the object location. I have corrected my first answer.

AM
 

Related to Lenses, diminished and magnified

What is the difference between a lens that is magnified and a lens that is diminished?

A magnified lens is one that makes an object appear larger than its actual size, while a diminished lens makes an object appear smaller than its actual size.

How do lenses magnify or diminish an object?

Lenses magnify or diminish an object by bending the light rays that pass through them. A convex lens (thicker in the middle) converges light rays to a focal point, making the object appear larger. A concave lens (thinner in the middle) diverges light rays, making the object appear smaller.

What factors affect the magnification or diminishment of a lens?

The shape, curvature, and thickness of the lens all play a role in the magnification or diminishment. Additionally, the distance between the object and the lens, as well as the distance between the lens and the observer, can also impact the perceived size of the object.

How do I calculate the magnification or diminishment of a lens?

The magnification or diminishment of a lens can be calculated by dividing the size of the image by the size of the object. This is known as the magnification ratio, and it can also be expressed as a percentage.

What are some common uses for magnified and diminished lenses?

Magnified lenses are commonly used in eyeglasses, telescopes, and microscopes to help people see objects more clearly. Diminished lenses are used in cameras and other optical devices to help capture a larger field of view. They are also used in some corrective eyewear for individuals with certain vision impairments.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
701
  • Optics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top