Logarithm problem, differences

  • Thread starter Thread starter matxjos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the logarithmic relationship in pH calculations, specifically how a difference in hydronium ion concentration affects pH. It highlights that if two concentrations differ by a factor of 2, their pH values differ by log(2). Participants clarify the confusion around the use of √2, concluding that the correct difference is simply log(2). The conversation also touches on frustrations with errors in solutions manuals that complicate learning. Ultimately, the participants reach a consensus on the correct logarithmic relationship in pH calculations.
matxjos
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I feel so dumb. I cannot figure out this relationship for the life of me.pH= -log[H+]

Imagine 2 concentrations. If the hydronium ([H+]) concentration differs by a factor of 2, it means the pH of the 2 solutions differs by -log √2

HOW?!
So basically, what they're saying is
(logx)(log√2)=log2x

HOW?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
where did you get the sqrt(2) from?

they actually differ by the log(2).

2 * 0.05 = 0.1 and in log form: log(2) + log(0.05) = log(0.1)

hence log(2) = log(0.1) - log(0.05)
 
jedishrfu said:
where did you get the sqrt(2) from?

they actually differ by the log(2).

2 * 0.05 = 0.1 and in log form: log(2) + log(0.05) = log(0.1)

hence log(2) = log(0.1) - log(0.05)


Okay...after more thought, I am convinced my solutions manual is wrong. I hate how many errors are in these things. Thanks jedishrfu.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top