Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein.

In summary, when dealing with particles, the statistics used depends on their properties. For identical and indistinguishable particles, Fermi-Dirac statistics should be used, while for distinguishable classical particles, Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics is appropriate. However, in the case of a system of identical but distinguishable particles with a degeneracy at high densities, there is some confusion as to which statistics should be used. While the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics is a good approximation for nondegenerate gases, it is not exact for distinguishable particles. This highlights the importance of distinguishability in determining the appropriate statistics to use.
  • #1
Clau
11
0
If we have indistinguishable particles, we must use Fermi-Dirac statistics.
To Identical and indistinguishable particles, we use Bose-Einstein statistics.
And, to distinguishable classical particles we use Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

I have a system of identical but distinguishable particles, where the second level has a degeneracy.

I was reading at Wikipedia: "Degenerate gases are gases composed of fermions that have a particular configuration which usually forms at high densities."

My question is: Should I use Fermi-Dirac statistics in this case?

I'm confused. I was reading Reif and it seems that I should use Maxwell-Boltzmann just to nondegenerate gases. But if my system is made by distinguishable particles, it seems that I should use MB statistics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not an expert on this and if I'm making an error, please correct me. But I thought that distinguishability is the key element, which determines that one should use the MB statistics. The MB statistics is ALSO a good approximation to the other distributions in certain limiting cases (such as dilute media), but I thought that if we deal with distinguishable components, that MB was exact. (the problem being, of course, that there do not exist systems of distinguishable elementary particles in nature)
 
  • #3


I can clarify the use of statistics in different systems of particles. The three statistics you mentioned, Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac, and Bose-Einstein, are used to describe the behavior of particles in different physical systems.

Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics apply to distinguishable classical particles, meaning particles that can be distinguished from one another based on their properties such as mass, charge, or spin. This type of statistics is used to describe non-degenerate gases, where the particles do not interact with each other and their energy levels are not quantized.

Fermi-Dirac statistics, on the other hand, apply to identical and indistinguishable particles, also known as fermions. These particles have half-integer spin and follow the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. This type of statistics is used to describe degenerate gases, where the particles are highly interacting and their energy levels are quantized.

Bose-Einstein statistics are also used for identical and indistinguishable particles, but in this case, the particles are bosons with integer spin. Unlike fermions, bosons can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. This type of statistics is used to describe systems with a large number of bosons, such as a gas of photons or a Bose-Einstein condensate.

In your case, if your system consists of identical but distinguishable particles with a degenerate second level, you should use Bose-Einstein statistics. This is because the particles are identical and indistinguishable, but their degenerate level allows for multiple particles to occupy the same energy state, making them behave like bosons.

I hope this clarifies the use of statistics in different systems of particles. It is important to choose the appropriate statistics based on the properties and behavior of the particles in your system.
 

1. What are Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics?

Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics are three different statistical distributions used to describe the behavior of particles in a physical system. They are based on the principles of classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and quantum statistics, respectively.

2. What types of particles do Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics apply to?

Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics apply to classical particles with no restrictions on their occupation of energy levels. Fermi-Dirac statistics apply to fermions, which are particles with half-integer spin such as electrons, protons, and neutrons. Bose-Einstein statistics apply to bosons, which are particles with integer spin such as photons and mesons.

3. How do these statistics differ from each other?

Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics describe a system of non-interacting particles, while Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics take into account the effects of quantum mechanics and interactions between particles. Additionally, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics have restrictions on the occupation of energy levels, while Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics do not.

4. What are the main applications of Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics?

Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are commonly used in thermodynamics and kinetic theory to describe the behavior of gases. Fermi-Dirac statistics are used in condensed matter physics to describe the behavior of electrons in metals and semiconductors. Bose-Einstein statistics are used in the study of quantum gases and superfluidity.

5. How do these statistics impact our understanding of the physical world?

Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics provide a framework for understanding the behavior of particles and systems at the microscopic level. They are essential in fields such as thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and condensed matter physics, and have allowed for the development of technologies such as transistors, lasers, and superconductors.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
816
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
4
Replies
108
Views
10K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top