Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods

In summary, the conversation discusses the measurement of length in a moving frame and how it relates to the concept of proper length in special relativity. It involves a system of two rods, one fixed and one oscillating, and the imprints they leave when passing over sand at a certain speed. The length of the imprint may not match the proper length of the system due to the simultaneous measurement of the end points in different frames.
  • #1
satyudhi
1
0
I take a rod and attach to its ends a another rod parallely at a distance r. The second rod oscillates about the first one through 180 degrees with some time period 't'. Now I am in a frame in which this system is moving at a speed 'v' with respect to me. I keep some sand in the way of this system. So when the rod passes over this sand, there will be 2 imprints left, one is the straight line which is the trajectory of our fixed rod while the other is the imprint of the osscilating rod when it struck the sand. This imprint will be of the same lengh as the oscillating rod as the whole (osscillating) rod struck the sand at once. But the oscillating rod is of the same length as the length of the fixed rod, as it it tied at the ends. So in principle the length of the imprint must be equal to the proper length of rod(system). But then this metod of length measurement gives me proper length in all frames, rather than a contracted length. So what will eb the length of the imprint actually?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In your reference frame the rod does not have proper length. Anyways, you need to be precise by what you mean "struck the sand at once". In special relativity you will need two clocks (in your reference frame)at different positions measuring the end points at the same time.
 

Related to Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods

1. What is "Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods"?

"Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods" is a scientific method used to measure the length of an object by using the principle of resonance. It involves attaching a rod to the object and oscillating it at its natural frequency, then measuring the wavelength of the resulting standing wave to determine the length of the object.

2. How does the principle of resonance apply to this method of measuring length?

The principle of resonance states that when a system is oscillating at its natural frequency, it will vibrate with the greatest amplitude. In the case of measuring length with oscillating rods, the rod attached to the object will vibrate with the greatest amplitude at its natural frequency, allowing for accurate measurement of the object's length.

3. What are the advantages of using this method compared to traditional measuring tools?

One advantage of using this method is that it does not require direct contact with the object being measured, making it ideal for measuring delicate or sensitive objects. It also does not rely on visual estimation, providing more precise and accurate measurements.

4. Are there any limitations to using oscillating rods for measuring length?

One limitation is that the object being measured must have a known natural frequency, as this is essential for the accuracy of the measurement. Additionally, the method may be affected by external factors such as air resistance, which can alter the natural frequency of the oscillating rod and lead to inaccuracies.

5. How can this method be used in real-world applications?

"Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods" has various real-world applications, such as measuring the length of bridges, cables, and other structures. It can also be used in the manufacturing industry for quality control purposes, as well as for measuring the length of objects in space exploration missions.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
956
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
83
Views
3K
Back
Top