Mesh Analysis AC, solving simultaneous equations....

In summary, the conversation is about a person seeking guidance on mesh analysis of an AC circuit. They share their equations and calculations with others in the conversation and receive feedback on potential mistakes and ways to improve their approach. The conversation also briefly touches on the use of complex notation and converting values back to polar form.
  • #1
kibara
6
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys I'm doing the mesh analysis of AC circuit and looking for some guidance.
Here is the mesh picture and some components data:
bBF28L


mesh-Analysis.png


Homework Equations


Kirchoff's voltage law and current law.

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided that mesh currents are going in clockwise direction.

mesh1: V1-I1(Z1+Z4)+I2Z4=0

120-I1(2-J5)+I2(-J5)=0 eq(1)

mesh2: -V3-I2(Z4+Z5)+I1Z4+I3Z5=0

-14.14+J14.14-I2(J4-J5)+I1(-J5)+I3(J4)=0 eq(2)

mesh3: -V2-I3(Z3+Z5)+I2Z5=0

-J120-I3(4+J4)+I2(J4)=0 eq(3)

Are these equations correct ?
 

Attachments

  • mesh-Analysis.png
    mesh-Analysis.png
    14 KB · Views: 1,047
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Thanks for your response gneill.

I've seen the above link previously that;s why I doubted my above equations as they are different so is my whole calculation which is as follows:

Multiplying eq(2) by 4+j4 and eq(3) by j4

-113.12-I2(4-j4)+I1(20-j20)+I3(-16+j16)=0 new eq(2)

480-I3(-16+j16)+I2(-16) new eq(3)

Adding (3) to (2)

366.88+I1(20+j20)-I2(20-j4)=0 eq(4)

Multiplying eq(1) by (20-j4) and (4) by (-j5)

120(20-j4)-I1(2-j5)(20-j4)+I2(-j5)(20-j4)=0

2400-j480-I1(20-j108)+I2(-20-j100)=0 new eq(1)

366.88(-j5)+I1(20+j20)(-j5)-I2(20-j4)(-j5)=0

-j1834.4+I1(100-j100)-I2(-20-j100)=0 new eq(4)

Subtracting new eq(4) from new eq(1)

j1834.4-j480+2400-I1(20-j108)-I1(100-j100)=0

2400+j1354.4-I1(120-j208)=0

I1 = 0.1090 + j11.4756 (to 4 d.p.)

Substituted value of I1 into initial eq(1) and obtained

120-(0.1090+j11.4756)(2-j5)+I2(-j5)=0

-57.596-j22.4062+I2(-j5)= -120

I2(-j5) = -120+57.596+j22.4062

I2= -4.4812-j12.4808

Substituted value of I2 into initial eq(3) and solved for I3:

-j120+(-4.4812-j12.4808)(j4)-I3(4+j4)=0

49.9232-j17.9248-I3(4+j4) = j120

I3=-11.0002-j23.481 Can someone tell me what did I do wrong. Also I'm not sure what to think about negative value of current when expressed in complex notation. I mean if the circuit would be pure resistance I would swap negative value for positive, right ? let's say if I= -12 A i would swap for I=12 A.

Another thing. In what format can I input complex notation in Octave ? Can it be:

octave:1> A = [4+j4, -j5+j2]

Regards.
 
  • #4
Taking another look at your mesh equations, I noticed that you've made ##V_3 = 14.14 - j14.14## for your mesh2 equation. Why the negative imaginary component? Should be ##10\sqrt{2}(1 + j)##.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
  • #5
As far as negative values in complex numbers, it could be thought of as a phase shift (or opposite direction). A phase shift of 180° is in the opposite direction.
As @gneill pointed out, it looks like you have a mistake, which needs fixing. But the value of -11 - j23.48 converted to polar form is 25.93 at an angle of -115.1°, if that helps you to visualize it.
 
  • Like
Likes kibara
  • #6
Hello again.

gneill V3 = 20 <45 = 14.14 + j14.14 V3 is going anticlockwise and I2 clockwise hence -V3 = -(14.14+j14.14) = -14.14-j14.14 right ?

scottdave I completely forgot about converting back to polar form.

Thanks for your input guys.
 
  • #7
kibara said:
gneill V3 = 20 <45 = 14.14 + j14.14 V3 is going anticlockwise and I2 clockwise hence -V3 = -(14.14+j14.14) = -14.14-j14.14 right ?
Right. But in your mesh equations you've written:
kibara said:
mesh2: -V3-I2(Z4+Z5)+I1Z4+I3Z5=0

-14.14+J14.14-I2(J4-J5)+I1(-J5)+I3(J4)=0 eq(2)
(My emphasis in red)

Note that only the first term of that complex number has been negated.
 
  • Like
Likes kibara
  • #8
Hi. Thanks for all your help. I have now solved for I as follows:

mesh 1: 120-I1(2-j5)+I2(-j5)=0
mesh 2: -14.14-j14.14-I2(-j)+I1(-j5)+I3(j4)=0
mesh 3: -j120-I3(4+j4)+I2(j4)=0

Multiplying (2) by (4+j4) and (3) by (j4)

-j113.12-I2(4-j4)+I1(20-j20)+I3(-16+j16)=0 equation (2A)

480-I3(-16+j16)+I2(-16)=0 equation (3A)

Adding (3A) to (2A)

480-j113.12+I1(20-j20)+I2(-20+j4)=0 equation (4)

Multiplying (1) by (-20+j4) and (4) by (-j5)

-2400+j480-I1(-20+j108)+I2(20+j100)=0 equation(1A)

-565.6-j2400+I1(-100-j100)+I2(20+j100)=0 equation (4A)

Subtracting (4A) from (1A) and solving for I1

-1834.4+j2880+I1(120-j8)=0

I1=16.8119-j22.8792

Substituting value of I1 into equation (1) and solving for I2

I2=25.9636-j40.1544

I=I1-I2=-9.1517+j17.2752 A

or I=19.5496 <117.9128o A

Now moving to node analysis :)
 

1. How do you use mesh analysis to solve AC circuits?

Mesh analysis is a method used to analyze AC circuits by breaking down the circuit into smaller loops, or meshes. Each mesh is analyzed using Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) to create a system of equations. These equations can then be solved simultaneously to find the currents through each component in the circuit.

2. What is the difference between mesh analysis and nodal analysis?

Mesh analysis breaks down a circuit into loops while nodal analysis breaks down a circuit into nodes. While nodal analysis uses Kirchhoff's current law (KCL) to create a system of equations, mesh analysis uses KVL. The choice between the two methods depends on the complexity of the circuit and personal preference.

3. How do you handle AC sources in mesh analysis?

In mesh analysis, AC sources are represented by their phasor values. These phasors take into account the magnitude and phase of the AC source. The phasors are then used in the KVL equations to solve for the currents in the circuit.

4. Can you use mesh analysis to solve circuits with dependent sources?

Yes, mesh analysis can be used to solve circuits with dependent sources. However, the dependent sources must be converted into their equivalent independent sources before applying mesh analysis. This can be done by using source transformation techniques.

5. What are the limitations of mesh analysis?

Mesh analysis is only applicable to circuits with a single source or multiple sources in series. It is also not suitable for circuits with superposition, such as circuits with switches or transistors. Additionally, mesh analysis can become complex for circuits with a large number of components or meshes.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
6
Replies
187
Views
55K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
2
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top