Methane mixed with air at 16:1 by mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass fraction of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, and methane in a mixture of methane and air at a 16:1 mass ratio, 1 atm, and 298K. Participants initially approach the problem as a combustion reaction, leading to complex equations and confusion over the number of products. However, it is clarified that the problem is simply about mixing gases, not combustion, simplifying the calculations. The correct approach involves using the density of air to determine the mass of each gas component and then calculating their mass fractions based on the total mass of the mixture. The final solution requires dividing the mass of each gas by the total mass to find the respective mass fractions.
igowithit
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Methane is mixed with air at a 16:1 per mass ratio at 1atm and 298K. Calculate the mass fraction of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, and methane in the final mixture

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, change mass ratio of reactants to mole ratio

$$
\frac{16 g CH_4}{16 g/mol CH_4} = 1 mol CH_4
$$

$$
\frac{1 g Air}{28.97 g/mol Air} = 0.0345 mol Air
$$

or in nice round terms,

$$
29 mol CH_4
$$
$$
1 mol Air
$$

leading to

$$
29 CH_4 + 1*(0.00933Ar + 0.7809N_2 + 0.2095O_2) = aCH_4 + bCO_2 + cAr + dN_2 + eO_2 + fH_2O + gH_2 + hOH
$$

I feel like this is way too many products to reasonably allow for a timely solution. Anyways, setting up a mass balance for each of the 5 elements in the equation leads to

$$
C: 29 = a + b
$$
$$
H: 4*29 = 4a + 2f + 2g + h
$$
$$
Ar: 0.00933 = c
$$
$$
N: 2*0.7809 = 2d
$$
$$
O: 2*0.2095 = 2b + 2e + f + h
$$

we now know c and d just from these equations leaving us with 3 equations but 7 unknowns (a,b,e,f,g,h,and T). Set up ##K_p## equations based of stoichiometric equations. I'll make a guess at temperature, therefore I only have to set up 3 ##K_p## equations to go with the 3 mass balance equations I already have. However, this is where I'm stuck. When I do this, I end up with crazy complex equations that even Matlab can't solve for the coefficients.

I feel like I have entirely too many products, but I don't know how to pick and choose which ones to keep and which ones to remove. Is there any easier path to take for this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement doesn't say that the mixture is ignited. Are you sure it is?
 
Chestermiller said:
The problem statement doesn't say that the mixture is ignited. Are you sure it is?

No, the problem statement does not specify whether or not the mixture is in combustion or not. It simply states it is a mixture. I'm not sure how that changes the problem though?

EDIT: Wait, I think I see what you're saying now. I'm trying to work as a combustion problem and it's actually just an extremely simple mixture of two gases. That makes things much easier.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
igowithit said:
an extremely simple mixture of two gases

Actually a mixture of several gases, as air is a mixture itself. But I agree on the "simple" part :wink:
 
igowithit said:

Homework Statement


Methane is mixed with air at a 16:1 per mass ratio at 1atm and 298K. Calculate the mass fraction of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, and methane in the final mixture?
It is clearly written that it is methane mixed with air (1 atm is an indication of air) so it is 16 parts by mass of methane and one part by mass air (at 1 atm and 298K).
Use information that density of air is 1.2754 g./L (at 298K )to calculate the mass of each component of gas with its percent composition by mass .Now 1L of air is added to 16*1.2754 g of methane and this will give you 16:1 ratio .Divide each mass of individual gas (obtained above)with total mass of the sample in 1L (1.2754+16*1.2754) to get mass fraction of each component of the gas.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top