MHB Minimize the following boolean equation.

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on minimizing the Boolean equation f(w,x,y,z) = wx + w\bar{x} + wz + xy. A participant initially attempted to simplify the expression but encountered confusion regarding the operations used in the simplification process. They incorrectly replaced the addition between terms with multiplication, leading to an unclear result. Another participant clarified the simplification steps, emphasizing the use of distribution, the complement law, and the absorption law to arrive at the final simplified form: f(w,x,y,z) = w + xy. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying Boolean algebra rules to achieve accurate simplification.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Minimize the following Boolean Equation. Write out the simplified formula (SOP FORM).

Need someone to check this. I got the answer wrong somehow.

$f${w,x,y,z) = $$w*x + w * \bar{x} + w * z + x * y$$

My answer:
$$=(wx + w\bar{x})(wz + xy)
=w(x + \bar{x})
=w * 1 = w(wz + xy) = wz + xy$$
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
$f${w,x,y,z) = $$w*x + w * \bar{x} + w * z + x * y$$

My answer:
$$=(wx + w\bar{x})(wz + xy)[/math]
I don't understand why you replaced + between $(wx+w\bar{x})$ and $(wz+xy)$ in the original expression with * in the second expression. Which operation is in the problem statement?

shamieh said:
$$=w(x + \bar{x})
=w * 1$$
What happened to $(wz+xy)$? When you write =, it should indeed mean "equal", not "I will work on one subexpression and later return to the other one".

shamieh said:
$$w(wz + xy) = wz + xy$$
Here you return the second factor $(wz+xy)$.
 
So what's the solution? Because I'm lost.
 
I would do
\begin{align*}
f&=wx + w \bar{x} + wz + xy \qquad \text{(original expression)} \\
&=w(x+ \bar{x})+wz+xy \qquad \text{(distribution law)} \\
&=w \cdot 1+wz+xy \qquad \text{(complementation or excluded middle)} \\
&=w+wz+xy \qquad \text{(identity for $\cdot$)} \\
&=w+xy \qquad \text{(absorption law)}.
\end{align*}
 
Wow ach, thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top