Mistakes in Matlab, Wolfram, Derive and Ti Nspire

In summary, the conversation discusses errors and inconsistencies in various math programs such as Matlab, Wolfram Alpha, Derive 6, and TI Nspire. The speaker, Jefferson Alexander Vitola, shares some examples and comparisons of these errors and mentions a new numerical method he has developed for handling oscillatory integrals. He also clarifies that the solutions provided by MarkFL are accurate and invites any questions.
  • #1
jeffer vitola
26
0
hello remember not speak English and use a translator on line,

together some pictures to show some errors,from a simple integral or easy to those who are not as oscillatory integrals, when I worked and ask oscillatory integrals or approximate numerical answers, also when try plot a complex function on a small scale, the graph has cuts which is not correct because the complex function is continuous in these intervals,i want job *2 years ago texas instruments contact and wolfram alpha for these failures corrected, and I don't not *was hired as a consultant mathematician of his companies, as *i don't not they hired me, there are some mathematical problems of these programs, I do as a publication for knowledge general, I *not upload all the photos , low quality pictures so they could see on this forum. as the translator is bad clarify that I have not been hired by wolfram alpha or by texas instruments. never.*
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)

hola recuerden que yo no hablo ingles me toca usar un traductor en linea,, escribio en español you que la traduccion es muy mala. al no ser contratado como consultor matematico para texas instruments o wolfram alpha, entonces yo decidi publicar algunos errores que he encontrado desde hace you mas de 2 años entonces ahora lo voy a publicar como pasatiempo.att
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)

View attachment 917View attachment 918View attachment 919View attachment 920View attachment 921
 

Attachments

  • foto1.jpg
    foto1.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 133
  • foto2.jpg
    foto2.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 136
  • foto4.jpg
    foto4.jpg
    45.9 KB · Views: 138
  • foto6.jpg
    foto6.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 132
  • foto7.jpg
    foto7.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 133
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Some mistakes en matlab, wolfram alpha,derive 6 and calculator ti nspire cas

In your first image, in the Derive 6 window, you have:

\(\displaystyle \int\frac{(2x-1)e^{x^2}}{e^x}\,dx=e^{x^2-x}\)

With the exception of the omission of the constant of integration, we can see that this is correct, we we rewrite the integral as:

\(\displaystyle \int(2x-1)e^{x^2-x}\,dx\)

Use the substitution:

\(\displaystyle u=x^2-x\,\therefore\,du=(2x-1)\,dx\)

and we have:

\(\displaystyle \int e^u\,du=e^u+C=e^{x^2-x}+C\)

For the definite integral:

\(\displaystyle \int_{15.73}^{19}\frac{78541212}{8411}\sin\left(x^4 \right)\,dx\)

W|A returns:

0.529973

An online Simpson's Rule calculator gives (with $n=2^{16}$):

0.53022209468772
 
  • #3
Re: Some mistakes en matlab, wolfram alpha,derive 6 and calculator ti nspire cas

MarkFL said:
In your first image, in the Derive 6 window, you have:

\(\displaystyle \int\frac{(2x-1)e^{x^2}}{e^x}\,dx=e^{x^2-x}\)

With the exception of the omission of the constant of integration, we can see that this is correct, we we rewrite the integral as:

\(\displaystyle \int(2x-1)e^{x^2-x}\,dx\)

Use the substitution:

\(\displaystyle u=x^2-x\,\therefore\,du=(2x-1)\,dx\)

and we have:

\(\displaystyle \int e^u\,du=e^u+C=e^{x^2-x}+C\)

For the definite integral:

\(\displaystyle \int_{15.73}^{19}\frac{78541212}{8411}\sin\left(x^4 \right)\,dx\)

W|A returns:

0.529973

An online Simpson's Rule calculator gives (with $n=2^{16}$):

0.53022209468772

forgive I was not clear in the first image at the top, it shows that the texas instruments calculator can not take the integral, but the same image compare with a program called derrive 6 which although they are the same texas instruments company computer program has a better structure in some fields of mathematics more than the calculator from the same company, on the other images do a comparison of the errors committed by one or other program or sometimes in all programs. is just a small sample that sometimes math programs contradict one another or that some are successful and others are not,or in the case of the same program wolfram alpha contradicts himself by giving some numerical approximation modes for oscillatory integrals despite being the same exercise raised from the beginning,my language is very limited in this language because as not handling and all I have to do it through a translator if you think I can write in Spanish explaining each image, because if you look closely compare a program on top of the same image and the other at the bottom of the same photograph, or sometimes it is the same program but show different solutions giving the same problem and not are good solutions.

this type of oscillatory integrals \(\displaystyle \int_{15.73}^{19}\frac{78541212}{8411}\sin\left(x^4 \right)\,dx\), I me find designed a new numerical method to calculate and am in copyright to publish freely and that I what me recognized as the creator of the numerical method, I'm working on it.
clarify that your MarkFL solutions are perfect ,,,, what I mean is that mathematics programs sometimes contradict each other finding different solutions to the same problem and are not correct, or sometimes not even find a solution to a problem proposed. any questions write me.:)

att
jefferson alexander vitola(Bigsmile)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Okay, now I see what you are referring to with the first integral...my TI-89 Titanium returns the same result as your TI Nspire.

I did notice that the second integral returns wildly different results with the online Simpson's Rule calculator until the number of steps was made sufficiently large. It may be that with such rapidly oscillating functions some numeric integration algorithms will fail because care is not taken to ensure successive results do not differ by a small enough value.

If you have developed an algorithm that handles such oscillatory functions in a superior manner than that which is currently implemented by mainstream software, then I applaud your ingenuity!
 
  • #5
MarkFL said:
Okay, now I see what you are referring to with the first integral...my TI-89 Titanium returns the same result as your TI Nspire.

I did notice that the second integral returns wildly different results with the online Simpson's Rule calculator until the number of steps was made sufficiently large. It may be that with such rapidly oscillating functions some numeric integration algorithms will fail because care is not taken to ensure successive results do not differ by a small enough value.

If you have developed an algorithm that handles such oscillatory functions in a superior manner than that which is currently implemented by mainstream software, then I applaud your ingenuity!

I hope as good contributions from the mistakes and failures that all users of this forum have found that the work programs in math and you know,,, is also including errors in different calculators and math programs,,,I'll be watching to see which errors and faults found all of you, in programs of math and calculators,,,att
jefferson alexander vitola(Bigsmile)
 
  • #6
jeffer vitola said:
hello remember not speak English and use a translator on line,

together some pictures to show some errors,from a simple integral or easy to those who are not as oscillatory integrals, when I worked and ask oscillatory integrals or approximate numerical answers, also when try plot a complex function on a small scale, the graph has cuts which is not correct because the complex function is continuous in these intervals,i want job *2 years ago texas instruments contact and wolfram alpha for these failures corrected, and I don't not *was hired as a consultant mathematician of his companies, as *i don't not they hired me, there are some mathematical problems of these programs, I do as a publication for knowledge general, I *not upload all the photos , low quality pictures so they could see on this forum. as the translator is bad clarify that I have not been hired by wolfram alpha or by texas instruments. never.*
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)

hola recuerden que yo no hablo ingles me toca usar un traductor en linea,, escribio en español you que la traduccion es muy mala. al no ser contratado como consultor matematico para texas instruments o wolfram alpha, entonces yo decidi publicar algunos errores que he encontrado desde hace you mas de 2 años entonces ahora lo voy a publicar como pasatiempo.att
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)

View attachment 917View attachment 918View attachment 919View attachment 920View attachment 921
hi all, as I had said before I will continue publishing mistakes math programs, I recommend you look well put pictures that the integrals are simple but the program fails with the change of variable and can not develop and other computer does not understand the substitutions that are also including calculator ti-nsipre cas, and remember I use a translator online,,, greetings from Colombia,,,.,.att
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)

View attachment 3511View attachment 3509View attachment 3512View attachment 3513View attachment 3510View attachment 3514View attachment 3515View attachment 3516View attachment 3517

att
jefferson alexander vitola (Bigsmile)
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 80
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    81.7 KB · Views: 73
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 74
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    90.1 KB · Views: 77
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 81
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    66.4 KB · Views: 76
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 78
  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 77
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    51.9 KB · Views: 70

1. What are common mistakes when using Matlab?

Some common mistakes when using Matlab include using incorrect syntax, not properly closing brackets or parentheses, and not assigning variables properly. It is also important to check for any typos or misspelled function names.

2. How can I avoid mistakes when using Wolfram?

To avoid mistakes when using Wolfram, it is important to double-check your input and make sure all parentheses and brackets are closed properly. It is also helpful to use the built-in syntax highlighting feature to catch any errors.

3. What are some common errors when using Derive?

Some common errors when using Derive include using incorrect syntax, not properly defining variables, and forgetting to use the "d" operator when differentiating. It is also important to check for any typing errors in mathematical expressions.

4. How do I troubleshoot mistakes in Ti Nspire?

To troubleshoot mistakes in Ti Nspire, it is helpful to use the built-in syntax checker to catch any errors. It is also important to check for any typos or misspelled function names. Additionally, double-checking the order of operations can help avoid mistakes.

5. What should I do if my calculations in these programs are giving unexpected results?

If your calculations in these programs are giving unexpected results, it is important to check for any mistakes in your input, such as incorrect syntax or missing variables. It can also be helpful to consult the software's documentation or seek assistance from a more experienced user.

Back
Top