Monoid of specifications for a group

  • Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Group
In summary, a specification of a group G that acts on a set S is a set of ordered pairs of elements of S such that no two distinct ordered pairs have the same first element.
  • #1
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,861
1,598
Monoid of "specifications" for a group

The question of whether there is any standard math associated with specifications of ordered pairs on a group went nowhere (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=640395), so I will spell out what I have in mind.

It appears possible to define a monoid of "specifications" for a group G, as sketched below. Is there a technical name for this monoid? Is it a special case of some standard structure in group theory?

--------

Let G be a group. Each element [itex] g \in [/itex] G can be identified with the function that permutes th-e elements of [itex] G [/itex] by left multiplication. In what follows we will consider [itex] g [/itex] to be the set of ordered pairs [itex] \{(x,gx): x \in G \} [/itex].

Define a specification [itex] s [/itex] on [itex] G [/itex] to be a set of ordered pairs of elements of [itex] G [/itex] such that there exists an element [itex] g \in G [/itex] such that [itex] s \subset g [/itex].

For example, Let [itex] G [/itex] be the group of permutations on the set of 4 letters [itex] \{a,b,c,d\} [/itex] then the set [itex] s = \{(a,b),(c,a)\} [/itex] is a specification since the group element [itex] g_1 = \{(a,b),(b, c),(c,a),(d,d) \} [/itex] contains [itex] s [/itex] as a subset. (There is also another group element [itex] g_2 = \{(a,b),(b,d),(c,a),(d,c)\} [/itex] that contains [itex] s [/itex].) In general, a specification need not define a unique group element.)

For a specification [itex] s [/itex] on a group [itex] G [/itex] , denote by [itex] G(s) [/itex] the set of elements in [itex] G [/itex] that contain [itex] s [/itex].

Examples:

In the previous example [itex] G(s) = \{g_1,g_2\} [/itex].

If [itex] g \in G [/itex] then [itex] G(g) = g [/itex] since the ordered pairs of [itex] g [/itex] define it uniquely.

[itex] G\{\emptyset \} [/itex] is the entire set of elements of [itex] G [/itex].

Define a multiplication operation on two specifications as follows:

Let [itex] s,t [/itex] be specifications on the group [itex] G [/itex]. Define the product [itex] s t [/itex] to be the specification consisting the all ordered pairs [itex] {x,y} [/itex] such there is some ordered pair [itex] (a,y) \in s [/itex] and some ordered pair [itex] (x,a) \in t [/itex]

A specification defines a 1-1 function from a subset of [itex] G [/itex] onto another subset of [itex] G [/itex]. The product of two specifications amounts taking the composition of two such functions on the intersection of their domains.

The identity element [itex] I [/itex] of the group [itex] G [/itex] defines a specification that is a multiplicative identity for the above product operation. The set of all possible specifications for a group [itex] G [/itex] forms a monoid under the product operation.

The monoid of specifications is not the same as a monoid formed by subsets of the group, i.e., in general, [itex] G(s t) [/itex] need not equal [itex] G(s) G(t) [/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Your first example does not correspond well to your definition of specification. There seem to be a mix-up between the 4 element set and its group of permutations.

Using the definition, G(s) is only one element (for nontrival s), but your example allow for some more structure.

So I suggest clearing up that confusion, and also give some motivation for why your monoid is interesting, as monoids can be made out of almost anything.
 
  • #3


Norwegian said:
Your first example does not correspond well to your definition of specification. There seem to be a mix-up between the 4 element set and its group of permutations.

Yes, it's a faulty example and faulty definition! For a specification to be non-trivial, I need to define it as a set of ordered pairs of elements of a set that is acted upon by a group rather than necessarily being a set of ordered pairs of elements of the group.

I'll try this:

Define:

A specification of a group [itex] G [/itex] that acts on a set [itex] S [/itex] is a set of ordered pairs of elements of [itex] S [/itex] such that no two distinct ordered pairs have the same first element.


Let [itex] G [/itex] be the group of permuations acting on the set of 3 integers {1,2,3}.
The 6 elements of the group [itex] G [/itex] are the functions
[itex]a = \{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3)\} [/itex]
[itex]b = \{(1,1),(2,3),(3,2)\} [/itex]
[itex]c = \{(1,2),(2,1),(3,3)\} [/itex]
[itex]d = \{(1,2),(2,3),(3,1)\} [/itex]
[itex]e = \{(1,3),(2,1),(3,2)\} [/itex]
[itex] f = \{(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)\} [/itex]


An example of a specification of the above group on the set {1,2,3} would be [itex] s = \{(1,3)\} [/itex]

(In my small example, if I put two ordered pairs in the specification, this is enough to determine a unique group element, but with a larger set of integers and a larger permutation group, I could put two ordered pairs in a specification without determining a unique group element.)

[itex] G(s) = \{e,f\} [/itex] since both [itex] e [/itex] and [itex] f [/itex] contain the ordered pair [itex] (1,3) [/itex].


[itex] G(b) =G(\{ (1,1),(2,3),(3,2) \}) = {b} [/itex]


also give some motivation for why your monoid is interesting, as monoids can be made out of almost anything.

I don't have any strong motivation for this. I't simply idle curiosity and the fact that I happen to glance at the book "introduction To Semigroups" by Mario Petrich because I was moving books around while rearranging my bedroom.

The standard game in finite groups is "I'll give you the order of the group and you tell me about possibilities for its subgroups". ( I don't understand why that game seems to be the only game in town- except that in practical applications, you might be able to count the symmetries of an object and want to know about the group of symmetries.) It seems to me that there might be other games involving "I'll tell you a little about the action of a group on this set and you tell me about the possibilities for the group".
 

1. What is a monoid?

A monoid is a mathematical structure consisting of a set of elements and an associative binary operation that combines any two elements in the set to produce a third element in the same set. It also has an identity element, which when combined with any other element, results in that same element.

2. What is the difference between a monoid and a group?

A group is a more specific type of monoid that also requires the operation to have an inverse element for each element in the set. This means that every element has a unique "undo" operation. In contrast, a monoid does not necessarily have an inverse element for each element in the set.

3. How are monoids used in specifications for groups?

Monoids are used in group specifications to define the structure and properties of the group's operation. This helps to ensure that the group follows certain rules and properties, such as associativity and the existence of an identity element.

4. Can monoids be used in other areas of mathematics?

Yes, monoids are a fundamental structure in abstract algebra and have applications in other areas of mathematics, such as computer science and physics. They can also be used to model and study various systems, such as symmetries in geometry and operations in automata theory.

5. Are there different types of monoids used in group specifications?

Yes, there are different types of monoids used in group specifications, such as finite monoids, commutative monoids, and free monoids. Each type has its own specific properties and applications in group theory.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
981
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
657
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
792
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top