Non-entangling environmental noise in QM/QFT

In summary, the question of whether non-entangling environmental noise exists raises concerns about the validity of current quantum theories. If such noise does exist, it would contradict the principles of quantum entanglement and call into question the fundamental nature of quantum physics. This is both a mathematical and empirical issue, and its existence would challenge the current understanding of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory.
  • #1
Auto-Didact
751
562
Does non-entangling environmental noise actually exist? The existence of such a thing seems to be fundamentally inconsistent with the properties of quantum entanglement.

It seems to me that if non-entangling environmental noise does exist, then standard QM - or QFT for that matter - automatically cannot be seen as a fundamental theory anymore.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Auto-Didact said:
Does non-entangling environmental noise actually exist?

What would this even mean?
 
  • #3
Environmental noise, e.g. some stochastic process within some stochastic differential equation, which only interacts with quantum systems in such a manner such that it cannot ever become entangled with the system that it is interacting with. In other words, the source of such non-entangling noise would be an intrinsically non-quantum effect occurring in nature.

The existence of such a noise source would automatically imply that quantum theory - in any of its currently accepted incarnations or formulations - is necessarily incapable of actually being a fundamental theory of physics.

NB: I'm not an experimentalist, which is why I'm asking, but this is as much an empirical question as it is a mathematical question.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
175
Views
6K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
7
Replies
244
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Back
Top