NVH Test for rubber mounts on firewall

In summary, the speaker is seeking advice on how to run NVH tests for a component that needs to be attached to a plate with four screws and rubber bushings. The speaker is unsure whether to mount the whole system to a dummy firewall or shake the component itself to test the effectiveness of the bushings in isolating vibrations. They also ask for recommendations on equipment to make and record measurements. The conversation includes suggestions for using two accelerometers, conducting modal testing with an impact hammer, and considering the natural frequency of the object on the mounts. The speaker also shares their redesigned test stand and asks for confirmation on the setup.
  • #1
BMW_Crashtester
Hello gang! I am dealing with a new issue at work and I though you might give me some much useful insight.

Im trying to fix a component to a plate and using 4 screws and rubber bushings to attach said plate to the firewall. The component is around 5-6 kgs and needs to held in place firmly but can't be attached in a rigid way because it generates vibrations in operation.

I need to run some NVH tests to see if the bushings do their thing. Problem is I don't know how to approach this:

-Do I mount the the whole thing to a dummy firewall in which I introduce vibrations with a shaker and attach accelerators to the bolts to see what gets inside the cabin? Or do I shake the component and see what vibration I transmit to the dummy firewall? What is the best approach to check how well the bushings isolate?

-How would a test bench look like? I know I need to do some tests with component freely moving (modal analysis) but how will I check for vibration filtering for example in the Z direction? If I attach the dummy firewall solidly to a test bench and shake the component won't that affect the results considering in real life the firewall moves too?

Im at a standstill here, NVH is new to me so all advice is welcomed!
 

Attachments

  • sketch.png
    sketch.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 501
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
Thanks for the recommendation Mike, but we are building this from the ground up and will be making our own bushings. So I still have to test them :nb)

! Also in the previous test for transfer function it is reported they excited the component with the shaker being handheld... Is this normal?
 
  • #4
What type of vibration does the component generate? ie. Does it rotate so will induce vibrations at a given frequency? What frequency range are we talking about?
What equipment do you have available to make and record measurements?

There are several approaches to test this.
Two accelerometers: one on the active side (ie the bolt head) and the other on the passive (ie after the mounting spring). You run the component as intended and plot the vibration transmissibility.
Modal testing in this case is probably best done with an impact hammer. Tap it in Z then measure the response. To isolate the vibration frequency needs to be 1.41x the natural frequency of the object on the mounts.
 
  • #5
Thank you for the input Chris :wink:

The component has a spinning motor, gears, ball bearings and hydraulic valves... We haven't yet purchased the equipment as we outsourced our initial test.
I was thinking about getting a shaker, an impact hammer and some ICP 3 axis accelerators. We have a pretty large budget, so we will also get the necessary capturing and processing equipment/software for future tests, do you have any recommendations?I can't place the accelerometers on the same bolt like you described because of space constrains.
This sketch shows how the first test was run (blue=component, red=bushings, green=accelerometers).
They suspended the "firewall" using a frame on some rubber isolating feet. Should I keep testing like this?
 

Attachments

  • setup.png
    setup.png
    888 bytes · Views: 526
  • #6
I've mainly used LMS TestLab in the past and a bit of HEAD ArtemiS for data acquisition and analysis. It's very, very difficult to advise on data acquisition without knowing the specifics of the problem as the devil is in the detail.

Effectively you want the transfer function across the bolt. Measuring further away will add noise factors (no pun intended) to this measurement.

So if you are only interested in lower frequency vibrations then you can assume that bit of the casing moves exactly in phase with the bolt (i.e. the casing can be considered rigid). If you are interested in higher frequency vibrations than that setup may not be suitable as the casing isn't stiff at those frequencies. If the direction of interest is horizontal (in that schematic) sticking the active side casing accelerometer on the side of the case may be better than sticking it on the top.
 
  • #7
I know toyota mounts their "abs actuator" to the firewall on newer prius cars but have separated it into two parts.
 
  • #8
I redesigned the test stand:
Now the firewall will be bolted down to the floor, it won't sit on cart with wheels and rubber dampers built in the frame.

The shaker will be held securely in a frame as well. I intend to make 3 measurements, one for x, one for y and for z.

Is this right Chris?
 

Attachments

  • new_setup.png
    new_setup.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 497
  • #9
Setup looks reasonable to me. All you really need to do is make sure that you aim to reduce and unwanted movement (eg make that shaker mount super stiff and heavy).

To be honest if you are planning to buy a system to do this, there will be some level of training included in any package. It's probably worth using this as a real world worked example and asking advice for setup and acquisition.
 
  • Like
Likes HowlerMonkey and BMW_Crashtester

1. What is NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall?

NVH stands for noise, vibration, and harshness. It is a type of testing used to measure and analyze the levels of noise, vibration, and harshness produced by a vehicle or its components. In this case, the focus is on the rubber mounts on the firewall, which are designed to absorb and reduce these factors.

2. Why is NVH testing important for rubber mounts on firewall?

NVH testing is important for rubber mounts on firewall because these mounts play a crucial role in reducing noise, vibration, and harshness inside the vehicle. If the mounts are not functioning properly, it can lead to increased levels of noise and vibration, which can affect the comfort and performance of the vehicle.

3. How is NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall conducted?

NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall is typically conducted using specialized equipment such as vibration sensors, microphones, and accelerometers. The mounts are subjected to different conditions and the levels of noise, vibration, and harshness are measured and analyzed to determine their performance.

4. What are the common issues found during NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall?

The most common issues found during NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall include excessive noise and vibration, inadequate shock absorption, and premature wear and tear. These issues can be caused by factors such as poor design, improper installation, or deterioration of the mounts over time.

5. How can NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall help improve vehicle performance?

NVH testing for rubber mounts on firewall can help improve vehicle performance by identifying any issues with the mounts that may affect the overall comfort and handling of the vehicle. By addressing these issues, manufacturers can ensure that the vehicle meets the required standards for noise, vibration, and harshness levels, resulting in a smoother and more enjoyable driving experience for the consumer.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
907
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
31
Views
11K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
12K
Back
Top