On the Importance of Positive Controls

In summary: The study found that home-brew fermentations using engineered yeast did not produce thebaine, a morphinan opiate, and only produced small amounts of reticuline, a precursor to thebaine. This highlights the technical challenges and differences between industrial bioreactors and home-brew fermentation that would need to be addressed in order for home-brew biosynthesis of medicinal opiates to become a reality.
  • #1
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,759
4,199
Found this abstract while browsing through some papers, and thought it was quite humorous:
Yeast-based biosynthesis of medicinal compounds traditionally derived from plant materials is improving. Both concerns and hopes exist for the possibility that individual small volume batch fermentations could provide distributed and independent access to a diversity of compounds some of which are now abused, illegal, or unavailable to many who need for genuine medical purposes. However, there are differences between industrial bioreactors and ‘home-brew’ fermentation. We used engineered yeast that make thebaine, a morphinan opiate, to quantify if differences in fermentation conditions impact biosynthesis yields. We used yeast that make an English ale as a positive fermentation control. We observed no production of thebaine and miniscule amounts of reticuline, an upstream biosynthetic intermediate, in home-brew fermentations; the positive control was palatable. We suggest that additional technical challenges, some of which are unknown and likely unrelated to optimized production in large-volume bioreactors, would need to be addressed for engineered yeast to ever realize home-brew biosynthesis of medicinal opiates at meaningful yields.

Endy, Galanie & Smolke. 2015 Complete absence of thebaine biosynthesis under home-brew fermentation conditions. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/024299

Full text freely available at http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/08/13/024299
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and mfb
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alternative introduction: "We found a reason to make beer at home using science grants".
 
  • #3
We observed no production of thebaine and miniscule amounts of reticuline, an upstream biosynthetic intermediate, in home-brew fermentations;
So - no 'opiate for the masses' ?
 
  • #4
jim hardy said:
So - no 'opiate for the masses' ?
Not at the moment, at least.
 

What is a positive control?

A positive control is an experimental group or condition that is expected to produce a known result. It is used to validate the experimental setup and ensure that the results are reliable and accurate.

Why are positive controls important in scientific research?

Positive controls are important because they help to establish the reliability and validity of the experimental results. They allow researchers to compare their experimental group to a known result and determine if any differences are due to the treatment being studied or other factors.

How do positive controls differ from negative controls?

Positive controls are expected to produce a known result, while negative controls are expected to produce no result. Negative controls are used to rule out any potential confounding variables or errors in the experimental setup.

What are some common examples of positive controls?

Some common examples of positive controls include using a known antibiotic to test the effectiveness of a new antibiotic, using a known cancer cell line to test the efficacy of a new cancer treatment, and using a known protein to confirm the activity of a new enzyme.

What are the potential consequences of not including a positive control in an experiment?

Not including a positive control in an experiment can lead to unreliable and invalid results. It may be difficult to determine if any observed effects are due to the treatment being studied or other factors, and the results may not be reproducible. This can also lead to false conclusions and wasted time and resources.

Back
Top