Ontology of measurement and correlation

In summary, a non-commuting measurement on a quantum property, such as spin, can be viewed as preparing the wavefunction. This makes it difficult to determine if the outcome represents the property itself or if the property was prepared. However, if the property is prepared, we can predict its correlation with a subsequent measurement. The question then arises of whether the property itself is real, or if only the correlation between two measurements is real.
  • #1
entropy1
1,230
71
If a non-commuting measurement is made on a quantum property (like spin), this can be seen as the wavefunction being prepared. So you can't tell if the outcome represents the property, or that the property is prepared. However, if the property is prepared, we can predict the correlation with a consecutive measurement of the same property.

So my question is if the property is real, or that only the correlation between two measurements is real.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
entropy1 said:
If a non-commuting measurement is made
What is a non-commuting measurement? Measurements are not operators in a Hilbert space, commutation makes no sense for them.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
7
Replies
244
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
84
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
96
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
713
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
204
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
114
Views
5K
Back
Top