Open and Closed Sets .... Conway, Example 5.3.4 (b) .... ....

In summary: This is the same as:|r - d(x,a)| ≤ rThis inequality can be rewritten as:r - d(x,a) ≤ r and r + d(x,a) ≥ rCombining these two inequalities, we get:0 ≤ d(x,an) ≤ 2rSo, in summary, the Reverse Triangle Inequality implies that |d(x,a) - d(an,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ 2r.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,990
48
TL;DR Summary
The thread concerns the use of the reverse triangle inequality to prove that an open ball is an open set ...
I am reading John B. Conway's book: A First Course in Analysis and am focused on Chapter 5: Metric and Euclidean Spaces ... and in particular I am focused on Section 5.3: Open and Closed Sets ...

Conway's Example 5.3,4 (b) reads as follows ... ...
Conway - Example 5.3.4 ( b)  ... .png


Note that Conway defines open and closed sets as follows:

Conway - Defn of Open and Clsed Sets .. .png

Now ... in the text of Example 5.3.4 shown above we read the following:

" ... ... the Reverse Triangle Inequality implies ##\mid d(x,a) - d( a_n, a ) \mid \ge d(a_n, x) \ge r## ... ... "Can someone please explain to me exactly why ##\mid d(x,a) - d( a_n, a ) \mid \ge d(a_n, x) \ge r## ...

My thoughts on this are as follows ...

It seems to me that the Reverse Triangle Inequality implies ##\mid d(x,a) - d( a_n, a ) \mid \le d(a_n, x)## ... ?Hope someone can clarify the above issue ...

Peter===================================================================================The above post mentions the Reverse Triangle Inequality ... Conway's statement of that inequality is as follows:
Conway - Reverse Triangle Inequality .png

Hope that helps ..

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it is a mistake. Indeed, the reverse triangle inequality is the other way around. I don't see a way to save the proof, so I can only offer some alternative proofs. The first is elementary, the second uses the topological definition of continuity, and the third one is probably the proof the author had in mind:

Way 1: Use that a set is open iff all its points are interior points.

Let ##x \in B(a,r)##. We prove that ##x## is an interior point of this ball. By assumption, we have ##d(x,a) < r## and thus ##\epsilon := r-d(x,a) > 0##.

Exercice for you: show that ##B(x,\epsilon) \subseteq B(a,r)##. This will show that ##x## is indeed an interior point.

Way 2: Prove that the map ##\psi: x \mapsto d(a,x)## is continuous (here you can use the reverse triangle inequality ;))

Then observe that ##B(a,r) = \psi^{-1}(]-\infty, r[)## is open, as inverse image of an open set under a continuous map.

Way 3: To prove ##B(a,r)## is open, we show that ##X\setminus B(a,r)## is closed using your definition.

So, let ##x_n \to x## and ##x_n \in B(a,r)## for all ##n##. Thus ##d(a,x_n) \geq r## for all ##n##.

Now, by the reverse triangle inequality we have

$$|d(a,x_n)-d(x,a)| \leq d(x_n,x) \to 0$$

Thus ##\lim_{n \to \infty} d(a,x_n) = d(x,a)##

By taking limits on both sides of the inequality ##d(a,x_n) \geq r##, it follows that ##d(a,x) \geq r##. Thus ##x \in X \setminus B(a,r)##.

Choose the proof you prefer :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3
Hello Peter,

The Reverse Triangle Inequality is a property of metric spaces, which are sets with a distance function defined between elements. In this case, the elements are points in a metric space and the distance function is denoted by d(a,b) where a and b are points in the space.

The Reverse Triangle Inequality states that for any three points a, b, and c in a metric space, the following inequality holds:

|d(a,c) - d(b,c)| ≤ d(a,b)

In the context of Example 5.3.4, we have four points: x, a, an, and a. The distance between x and a is d(x,a), the distance between an and a is d(an,a), and the distance between an and x is d(an,x). Using the Reverse Triangle Inequality, we can rewrite the inequality as:

|d(x,a) - d(an,a)| ≤ d(x,an)

Since we know that d(an,a) = r, we can substitute this into the inequality to get:

|d(x,a) - r| ≤ d(x,an)

This is the same as saying:

d(x,a) - r ≤ d(x,an) and d(x,a) + r ≥ d(x,an)

Combining these two inequalities, we get:

d(x,a) - r ≤ d(x,an) ≤ d(x,a) + r

This is the same as saying:

|r - d(x,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ r + d(x,a)

Since the distance between two points cannot be negative, we can remove the absolute value and rewrite the inequality as:

d(x,a) - d(an,a) ≤ d(x,an) ≤ d(x,a) + d(an,a)

This is the same as saying:

|d(x,a) - d(an,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ d(x,a) + d(an,a)

Which is the same as:

|d(x,a) - d(an,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ d(x,a) + d(an,a)

This is the same as:

|r - d(x,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ r + d(x,a)

Finally, we can substitute in d(an,a) = r to get:

|r - d(x,a)| ≤ d(x,an) ≤ r + d(x,a)

Which is the same as:

|r - d(x,a)| ≤
 

1. What is the difference between open and closed sets?

Open sets are sets that do not contain their boundary points, while closed sets contain all of their boundary points. In other words, an open set is a set where any point within the set has a neighborhood that is also contained within the set, while a closed set includes all of its limit points.

2. How do you determine if a set is open or closed?

To determine if a set is open or closed, you can look at its boundary points. If the set contains all of its boundary points, then it is closed. If it does not contain any of its boundary points, then it is open.

3. Can a set be both open and closed?

Yes, a set can be both open and closed. This is known as a clopen set. An example of a clopen set is the empty set, which does not contain any points and therefore does not have any boundary points.

4. What is the significance of open and closed sets in topology?

Open and closed sets are important concepts in topology because they help define the structure of a topological space. They also allow for the definition of other important concepts, such as continuity and compactness.

5. How is Example 5.3.4 (b) in Conway related to open and closed sets?

In Example 5.3.4 (b) in Conway, we are given a set of real numbers and asked to determine if it is open, closed, or neither. This example illustrates how the concept of open and closed sets can be applied in a specific context, and how it can be used to determine the properties of a given set.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
965
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
756
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top