Opinions on Rovelli's General Relativity: The Essentials?

In summary, the conversation discusses the newly published book "General Relativity: The Essentials" by Carlo Rovelli and its potential similarities to Dirac's "General Theory of Relativity." There are differing opinions on whether it can be considered a successor, as Rovelli's book includes philosophical discussions and covers aspects of GR related to GPS that are not found in Dirac's book.
  • #1
The Bill
374
146
I recently noticed that "General Relativity: The Essentials" by Carlo Rovelli has been published. Based on the description, table of contents, and the Amazon reviews, it seems to me that it might be a spiritual successor to Dirac's "General Theory of Relativity." Is that an accurate assessment?

If you've had a chance to give it a look, what were your thoughts? What purpose(s) do you think this text would be good for?
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The book discusses some basic GR aspects of GPS, which can hardly be found in other books.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
It looks very different from Dirac's book to call it a successor in any sense. Dirac has no philosophical discusstions at all, Rovelli on the other hand has plenty.
 

1. What is Rovelli's General Relativity: The Essentials?

Rovelli's General Relativity: The Essentials is a book written by physicist Carlo Rovelli that provides a concise and accessible introduction to the theory of general relativity. It covers the fundamental concepts and equations of general relativity, as well as its implications for our understanding of the universe.

2. Who is Carlo Rovelli and why is his work on general relativity significant?

Carlo Rovelli is an Italian theoretical physicist who is known for his contributions to the field of quantum gravity, including his work on loop quantum gravity. His book on general relativity is significant because it presents the theory in a clear and concise manner, making it more accessible to a wider audience.

3. How does Rovelli's approach to general relativity differ from other textbooks?

Rovelli's approach to general relativity is unique in that it focuses on the essential concepts and equations, rather than delving into the mathematical details. This makes it more accessible to readers without a strong background in mathematics or physics.

4. Is Rovelli's General Relativity: The Essentials suitable for beginners?

Yes, Rovelli's book is a great introduction to general relativity for beginners. It presents the theory in a clear and concise manner, without overwhelming readers with complex equations and mathematical concepts.

5. Are there any criticisms of Rovelli's General Relativity: The Essentials?

Some critics have noted that Rovelli's book may not be suitable for readers who are looking for a more in-depth understanding of general relativity. It is also worth noting that Rovelli's approach to the theory is just one perspective, and there are other textbooks that may present different interpretations and explanations of general relativity.

Similar threads

  • Poll
Relativity A First Course in General Relativity by Bernard Schutz
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
4K
High Energy Recommended books in HEP, QFT, QM, GR
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
3K
Admissions Honest opinions and advice on Statement of Purpose requested
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
931
Distinction between special and general relativity
    • Cosmology
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
I Some classical models of particles and quantum gauge theories
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
0
Views
1K
Other Relearning Math: Comparing Resources for the Best Learning Experience
    • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
I Does Special and General Relativity Affect Aging of Apollo Astronauts?
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Rovelli on Quantum Gravity
    • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
510
  • Sticky
I Quantum Interpretations and Foundations Guidelines
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top