Optimum profile of light pipe exit for narrow beam angle

In summary: Actually, I probably should have said convex, not concave, but who knows which will be best until you simulate both.
  • #1
Redron
8
4
I am trying to design an acrylic light pipe that has a 3W power red LED input with 60 degree beam angle.
I need a reasonably collimated exit light beam or at least a narrow angle output.
What I'd like to know is - what is the optimum shape of the exit end of the light pipe to produce the narrowest beam?
The first iteration is with a hemispherical exit. but I suspect that might produce total internal reflection for shallow angle rays at the edge and perhaps a wide angle beam.
Light pipe.png

Can anyone please suggest a better shape? Flat or convex may well be better, but I cannot afford a ray tracing program to verify this.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the purpose? Is uniformity important? Intensity? Visibility?
 
  • #3
hutchphd said:
What is the purpose? Is uniformity important? Intensity? Visibility?
The intent is just to deliver as much of the light to a small area about the same distance from the exit as the light pipe's length (approx 25mm) away.
Uniformity is unimportant, as is visibility.
 
  • #4
Two things:
+You will get maximum light using a narrow focus (often through-hole) LED and no light pipe.
+light pipes check these out https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/optics-light-pipes/102?s=N4XyA
 
  • #5
Redron said:
I cannot afford a ray tracing program to verify this.
Welcome to PF.

I did a Google search on Free Optical Ray Tracing Software and got a number of promising hits. Maybe check out the hit list to see if any of these software packages could work for you:

https://www.google.com/search?q=fre...software&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1

Also, I used to work with (lower power than 3W) 1mm optical fiber a fair amount, and the LED emitters were coupled pretty well to the 1mm fiber. Have you looked into something like that?

https://www.digikey.com/en/product-highlight/i/industrial-fiber-optics/leds-and-photodetectors?utm_adgroup=General&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Dynamic%20Search_EN_RLSA_Buyers&utm_term=&utm_content=General&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI4t-BxMTC8wIVBR6tBh0vRQp_EAAYAiAAEgLX1vD_BwE

1633961485082.png
 
  • Like
Likes Redron
  • #6
hutchphd said:
Two things:
+You will get maximum light using a narrow focus (often through-hole) LED and no light pipe.
+light pipes check these out https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/optics-light-pipes/102?s=N4XyA
The LED is a 3W SMD high power one and is mounted on an aluminium PCB for good heat dissipation.
I agree that you can get narrow angle through-hole ones, but they are low power.

I've already looked through Digi-Key and Mouser, but they all attempt to have a wide angle of visibility - the opposite of my requirement.
 
  • #7
Redron said:
The intent is just to deliver as much of the light to a small area about the same distance from the exit as the light pipe's length (approx 25mm) away.
Can you maybe just use a lens to focus the light? You will probably get a more intense focus without the light pipe...
 
  • #8
berkeman said:
Can you maybe just use a lens to focus the light? You will probably get a more intense focus without the light pipe...
No, the light pipe is necessary to insert the light source to the proper location.
If I had some idea of the optically optimal shape of the top face to concentrate the emerging light into a reasonably narrow beam, then that would solve the problem.
 
  • #9
Okay, fair enough. Have you had a look at the free software packages? They will have limitations on the number of optical elements, but that should not be an issue for this simulation. Probably you will want to experiment with the shape of the input and output surfaces of the light pipe...
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
Have you had a look at the free software packages?
No, I haven't. Can you suggest any names?
 
  • #11
I would just go through the Google hit list that I linked to. I used to know of a program written by a HAM radio operator (I think the name of the package involved his callsign), but that was many years ago. The simple version was free (up to maybe 5-6 lens elements), and there was a charge for the version that was unlocked for more complex problems.

BTW, your sketch shows a flat optical surface above the LED for the entry into the light pipe, but it would seem that you will probably want to use a concave surface to help collimate the LED light into the pipe, no?
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
you will probably want to use a concave surface to help collimate the LED light into the pipe, no?
Yes, you're right. That's on the list.
Thank you for the links.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #13
berkeman said:
use a concave surface to help collimate the LED light into the pipe
Actually, I probably should have said convex, not concave, but who knows which will be best until you simulate both. Good luck! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Redron
  • #14
Redron said:
No, the light pipe is necessary to insert the light source to the proper location.
The light pipe you have drawn is just a straight piece of plastic. If you really want to maximize the light, use the biggest pipe you can, put the flat back end flush on the unfocused LED and convex curve the front end to image the big multi-die LED onto your target. Just like a lens. In fact the easy way to build this is to glue (optical epoxy) a polycarbonate plano-convex lens onto a polycarbonate dowel. Glue the dowel on the LED also if you can. No lens on LED. The radius of curvature of the light pipe lens lens will be given by the Gauss formula for a single surface refraction.
You will be amazed by how much light pipes don't like to concentrate light...good luck.
 
  • Like
Likes Redron and berkeman
  • #15
hutchphd said:
You will be amazed by how much light pipes don't like to concentrate light...good luck.
I just saw your post after playing with one of the free ray tracing packages (Optical Ray Tracer 9.6) that berkeman suggested (Thanks berkeman).
It really does show how TIR sends light into all directions, as you pointed out.
This is the best simulation I can muster given the constraints, and I'd be happy with this outcome.
It diverges from your suggestion of removing the lens (which is already bonded to the LED) - an act that would expose the bonding wire and chip (!)
Given that the LED already produces a fairly narrow 60 degree beam, then having a convex collimating entry to the light pipe will allow most of the light to reach the other end without suffering TIR, resulting in a fairly parallel beam which can be focused by the desired amount.
The concave lens represents the LED emission pattern.

1634002303041.png


I know that this goes against all recommended light pipe design dogma, but this requirement is very different from the normal light pipe application. It is more like a very thick lens.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hutchphd
  • #16
If it is good enough, then it is good enough! Thanks for the report.
 
  • Like
Likes Redron
  • #17
Thanks to everyone for their help.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

1. What is the purpose of designing an optimum profile for light pipe exit?

The purpose of designing an optimum profile for light pipe exit is to achieve a narrow beam angle, which allows for more focused and efficient distribution of light. This is especially important for applications that require precise lighting, such as in medical devices or industrial machinery.

2. How does the shape of the light pipe exit affect the beam angle?

The shape of the light pipe exit plays a crucial role in determining the beam angle. A narrower and more tapered exit will result in a narrower beam angle, while a wider and less tapered exit will result in a wider beam angle. This is due to the principles of light refraction and reflection within the light pipe.

3. What factors should be considered when designing the optimum profile for light pipe exit?

Several factors should be considered when designing the optimum profile for light pipe exit, including the type of light source being used, the desired beam angle, the material and thickness of the light pipe, and the surrounding environment where the light will be used. These factors will influence the shape and dimensions of the light pipe exit.

4. Can the optimum profile for light pipe exit be determined mathematically?

Yes, the optimum profile for light pipe exit can be determined through mathematical calculations based on the principles of optics. This involves considering the geometry of the light pipe, the refractive index of the material, and the desired beam angle. Computer simulations and modeling can also be used to aid in the design process.

5. Are there any trade-offs to consider when designing an optimum profile for light pipe exit?

Yes, there may be trade-offs to consider when designing the optimum profile for light pipe exit. For example, a narrower beam angle may result in a more focused and intense light, but it may also limit the overall amount of light that can be transmitted through the light pipe. Additionally, a more complex and tapered exit may be more difficult and expensive to manufacture. Therefore, the designer must balance these factors to determine the most suitable profile for their specific application.

Similar threads

Can I Create a Visible Light Pattern Using a Combination of Laser Beam and LED?
    • Optics
Replies
2
Views
2K
What lenses and setup should I use for a very narrow beam projector?
    • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
5K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 241)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
8
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top