Phased array antenna vs single antenna for remote sensing.

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of single antennas for radio occultation in the Cosmic-1 satellites and the upcoming use of phased array antennas in the Cosmic-2 satellites. The research suggests that the phased array antenna can improve the signal to noise ratio in observations of the lower troposphere due to its higher antenna gain. However, the advantages of a phased array antenna over a single array are still not fully understood. It is also mentioned that there are many factors involved in antenna design and the technology for the second satellite may be more advanced. Ultimately, the decision to use a phased array antenna may have been based on its better performance and availability.
  • #1
Tone L
73
7
My question stems from the Cosmic-1 satellites using single antennas for radio occultation and the cosmic-2 sats that will use a phased array antenna.

I've done a fair amount of research in regards to the phased array antenna. Overall it seems to improve the signal to noise ratio when making observations in the lower troposphere (high antenna gain).

I have a weak understanding of antennas (not an engineer). So does anyone else know any other advantages to a phased array antenna in comparison to single array.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have to give the stock answer; "It all depends".
There are so many factors in antenna design and even more when it is to be mounted on a satellite.
There is a lot to be said for keeping things simple when possible. Presumably the occultation exercise can benefit from a steerable antenna and the available technology would probably be more advanced for the second satellite. So I would guess that the better performance would always have been preferred but was not available for the first mission.
PS Steerable would mean that a narrower beam could be used - hence the gain would be higher.
 

1. How does a phased array antenna differ from a single antenna in remote sensing?

A phased array antenna is composed of multiple individual antennas that work together to create a beam that can be steered in any direction, whereas a single antenna only has one beam direction. This allows a phased array antenna to have a wider coverage area and the ability to quickly change the direction of the beam.

2. Which type of antenna is better for remote sensing applications?

The choice between a phased array antenna and a single antenna depends on the specific needs of the remote sensing application. A phased array antenna is better for applications that require a wider coverage area and the ability to quickly change the direction of the beam, while a single antenna may be more suitable for applications that require a more focused and precise beam direction.

3. What are the advantages of using a phased array antenna for remote sensing?

A phased array antenna offers several advantages for remote sensing, including a wider coverage area, the ability to quickly change the direction of the beam, and improved signal processing capabilities. It also allows for smaller and lighter antenna systems compared to a single antenna, making it more suitable for mobile and space-based applications.

4. Are there any disadvantages to using a phased array antenna for remote sensing?

One disadvantage of using a phased array antenna for remote sensing is the increased complexity and cost of the system. The individual antennas must be carefully synchronized and controlled, which can be challenging and expensive. Additionally, the large number of individual antennas can lead to higher power consumption and potential points of failure.

5. How does the resolution of a phased array antenna compare to that of a single antenna for remote sensing?

The resolution of a phased array antenna is typically lower than that of a single antenna for remote sensing. This is because the individual antennas in a phased array are smaller and have less power, leading to a decrease in the overall signal strength and resolution. However, the wide coverage area and the ability to quickly change the direction of the beam can compensate for this lower resolution in some applications.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top