Photon Bouncing during APD Dead Time in Autocorrelation Measurement

  • A
  • Thread starter Theo2907
  • Start date
  • #1
Theo2907
1
4
TL;DR Summary
Encountering strange results in dark counts of APD. Suspect reflections during APD dead time causing interference. Seeking quick insights to mitigate this issue. Any advice is appreciated.
Hey fellow researchers,

I'm currently working on an autocorrelation g(2) measurement setup using two Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) connected through a multimode GRIN 50:50 beam splitter. Photons are delivered to the system via a multimode fiber (a PC-PC coupling to the beam splitter). However, I've been encountering a challenge and I believe it is related to the dead time of the APDs.
Below you can find a picture of the setup:
1702372340504.png


Before doing a complete g(2) measurement I wanted to check if my dark counts are incoherent (which should be the case). Unfortunately, I found that they are not incoherent, I did a measurement measuring the time difference between a measurement at APD 1 and APD 2 and I got peaks at around 20 ns and 80 ns.
You can see a screenshot of the graph below:

1702373825349.png


I couldn't explain it and no one in my lab has a good explanation for this phenomenon.

The peak at 20ns only happens when the beam splitter is actually coupled to the APDs, so a dark count measurement with the APDs not coupled to anything is completely incoherent (which is what we want).
The 80ns peak only happens when the multimode fiber(not present in the picture) is connected to the input fiber.

I do have a hypothesis though about this but I can't find any source online that verifies this.

I think that during the dead time of the APDs, incoming photons are being reflected, causing them to bounce back through the fiber. They are then reflected again at fiber couplings, the first one being the coupling between the input fiber and the MM fiber and there is another coupling from the MM fiber to another MM fiber.

Some people have advised me to use single-mode fibers instead and APC-APC couplings but if I use single-mode fiber my collection efficiency is not high enough and I don't get enough counts to make any measurement so that is not really an option. Later I want to measure light from single photon emitters in 4H-SiC so the collection efficiency is quite important.

I would greatly appreciate any insights, advice, or experiences you may have regarding this issue. Have you encountered similar challenges in your experiments? How did you address or mitigate the effects of this phenomenon?

Additionally, if anyone has recommendations for optimizing APD setups in autocorrelation measurements, please feel free to share. I'm open to suggestions and eager to learn from your expertise.

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Theo2907 said:
TL;DR Summary: Encountering strange results in dark counts of APD. Suspect reflections during APD dead time causing interference. Seeking quick insights to mitigate this issue. Any advice is appreciated.

I think that during the dead time of the APDs, incoming photons are being reflected, causing them to bounce back through the fiber.
I see there have been no responses yet so here's one: The time between the first small peak and the main peak is about 60ns. That represents a large path delay (20m??) and your image suggests you should expect less than 1m path lengths for any reflections. Could it be an instrumentation problem?
 

What is an APD in the context of autocorrelation measurements?

An Avalanche Photodiode (APD) is a highly sensitive semiconductor electronic device that exploits the photoelectric effect to convert light into electricity. In autocorrelation measurements, which are often used in optical experiments such as those involving lasers or quantum optics, an APD is used to detect photons. The sensitivity of the APD allows for the detection of very low levels of light.

What does dead time mean in relation to an APD?

Dead time in the context of an APD refers to the period immediately following the detection of a photon during which the APD is unable to detect another photon. This occurs because the APD needs time to reset after each detection event. During the dead time, any incoming photons will not be detected, which can affect the accuracy of measurements like autocorrelation.

How does photon bouncing affect autocorrelation measurements during APD dead time?

Photon bouncing refers to the scenario where photons are temporarily trapped within the optical setup, often due to reflections, and re-enter the APD after its dead time has elapsed. This can lead to erroneous counts or distortions in autocorrelation measurements, as these bounced photons might be counted as new events rather than being associated with their original incidence, thereby misleading the interpretation of the data.

What are typical strategies to mitigate the effects of APD dead time and photon bouncing in experiments?

To mitigate the effects of APD dead time and photon bouncing, scientists typically employ several strategies. These include optimizing the optical setup to minimize reflections and stray light paths, using beam splitters or optical isolators. Additionally, employing multiple APDs in a coincidence setup can help differentiate between true signal events and artifacts caused by photon bouncing. Adjusting the timing resolution and calibration of the APD system can also reduce the impact of dead time.

Can the APD dead time be adjusted or is it a fixed property?

The dead time of an APD is primarily determined by its physical and electronic design and is generally considered a fixed property. However, some advanced APD models allow for adjustments in the electronic readout or recovery settings to optimize performance for specific applications. This adjustment can help manage the effects of dead time but does not eliminate it entirely. Researchers often choose APDs with dead times suitable for their specific experimental needs based on the expected light levels and timing requirements.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
128
Views
31K
  • Optics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top