MHB Physics-Using vectors to find the components

AI Thread Summary
The trapper walks a straight-line distance of 6.2 km at an angle of +45 degrees, resulting in east and north components of 4.38 km each. To find the total distance if walking along the component displacements, one must sum the two components, yielding 8.76 km. The additional distance the trapper would need to walk is calculated by subtracting the actual distance (6.2 km) from this sum. This results in a need for an extra 2.56 km of walking. The discussion emphasizes the importance of vector components in calculating displacement and additional distance required.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Hello Everybody,

A trapper walks a 6.2 km straight-line distance from the cabin to the lake, beginning to the lake has an angle of +45 degrees. Determine the east and north components of her dispacement vector.

Work:
E component: $6.2\times\cos\left({45^{\circ}}\right)$ = 4.38

N Component:$6.2\times\sin\left({45^{\circ}}\right)$=4.38

I have troubles to next question:
How many more kilometers would the trapper have to walk if she walked along the component displacements?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You've found the length of the components, so if the trapper walks along the components, that distance would be the sum of the two components. To answer the question you would then need to subtract the actual distance walked from this sum. :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top