PWM and it`s duration (picosecond pulse widths)

In summary, the conversation revolves around finding a realistic circuit that can produce a PWM of 1 pico second on and 350 ps off. The recommended solution is using a 555 timer with a few pF capacitor and small resistances, but there are concerns about the feasibility of this at such small time scales. The need for such a precise pulse is for a research project involving a free electron laser. The difficulty and budget constraints of this task are discussed, with suggestions to try simpler projects first.
  • #1
Sveral
63
1
Hello,
I wanted to ask, if anyone knows of a realistic circuit, which could be capable of producing a PWM of 1 pico second on and 350 ps off. Thanks to everyone taking the time to answer in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try a 555 astable multivibrator with a few pF capacitor and very small resistances. But I'm not sure if that's realistic since other parasitic effects might be significant at this small time scale.
 
  • #3
What kind of load are you driving with this circuit? That too will be very significant.
 
  • #4
I haven't looked at the specs in a lot of years but I don't think a 555 can switch that fast.
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
  • #5
A 555 timer will never achieve the frequency in question. Unless I misunderstand the OP, we are talking about gigahertz frequencies. PWM at this frequency is a tall order. I have to wonder what is behind this requirement.
 
  • #6
Sveral said:
Hello,
I wanted to ask, if anyone knows of a realistic circuit, which could be capable of producing a PWM of 1 pico second on and 350 ps off. Thanks to everyone taking the time to answer in advance.
What are your signal and load requirements?
Also I usually try to ask a question like this. Are you SURE you need 1 pico second on times?
 
  • #7
350ps off is a start. Your basic timer should therefore run at 1/350ps ≈ 2.86GHz. On the other hand, at normal signal propagation rate in electronics (20cm/ns), 1 ps equals 0.2mm. A NOR gate with both inputs conected to the oscillator with 0.2mm signal length difference could thus shave off a 1ps pulse.

No, I do not know any logic family fast enough for that. Even the old MECL 3 would have problems with that speed. You need to design a fast ASIC...
 
  • #8
AFAIK switching times of so called "fast transistors" are in the ten of ns range at best, orders of magnitude too slow. 555 is in the same category at best.
 
  • #9
@Sveral you still have not told us what it is that you are actually trying to DO. Why do you need a 1ps wide pulse?
 
  • #10
donpacino said:
What are your signal and load requirements?
Also I usually try to ask a question like this. Are you SURE you need 1 pico second on times?
Yes, I am positive. It is needed to test a research, that was performed in the US for not fully explained reasons. It is made to create a PWM circuit, which would drive a 50 mW diode, which would prove or disprove a theory.
 
  • #11
phinds said:
@Sveral you still have not told us what it is that you are actually trying to DO. Why do you need a 1ps wide pulse?
Do, please, take a look a bit higher.
 
  • #12
Ok, Well like others have said this is not an easy feat. You will either need to hire someone to build an asic for you, or pursue similar options yourself.

your typical diode can be driven by ms times.

What is the load on the circuit? What are the rise and fall time requirements. You mention PWM, does this need to go from 0-100% duty cycle. With what resolution?
 
  • #13
donpacino said:
Ok, Well like others have said this is not an easy feat. You will either need to hire someone to build an asic for you, or pursue similar options yourself.

your typical diode can be driven by ms times.

What is the load on the circuit? What are the rise and fall time requirements. You mention PWM, does this need to go from 0-100% duty cycle. With what resolution?
100 mJ per
macropulse at a repetition rate of 30 Hz. Each
macropulse is composed of È104 micropulses
of 1 ps duration, spaced 350 ps apart. The
spectral width is 50 to
90 cm^-1. Honestly, there`s not much detail I can give, because I`m not really knowledgeable about this topic, except for the fact, that a free electron laser was used so the resolution should have been rather high.
 
  • #14
Sveral said:
Honestly, there`s not much detail I can give, because I`m not really knowledgeable about this topic, except for the fact, that a free electron laser was used so the resolution should have been rather high.

Why are you doing this? Are you a student? is this for a company? is this for fun?

This is a rather large difficult task you are asking about.
 
  • #15
donpacino said:
Why are you doing this? Are you a student? is this for a company? is this for fun?

This is a rather large difficult task you are asking about.
I know, that it`s on the ridiculously difficult scale of things, but...it`s for a research, I`m a student and it`s for fun and research.
 
  • #16
donpacino said:
Why are you doing this? Are you a student? is this for a company? is this for fun?

This is a rather large difficult task you are asking about.
The only way I`ve read it definitely could be done is with a free electron laser, but that`s not really an option...
 
  • #18
Sveral said:
Yes, I am positive. It is needed to test a research, that was performed in the US for not fully explained reasons
Could you please provide links to the papers which describe the previous work? What is your budget for equipment for setting up this experiment?
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #19
Sveral said:
I know, that it`s on the ridiculously difficult scale of things, but...it`s for a research, I`m a student and it`s for fun and research.

Have you done anything similar before?

assuming this is for that laser, its a fairly significant undertaking. You said you're not really knowledgeable on the subject. Have you worked with lasers or circuitry before?

When you say for fun and research, is this your dip into the world of lasers? Did you just read a paper and decide hey this looks cool I'll do it.

One needs to walk before they can run. I hate to discourage you, but you may want to try something simpler. As you can tell from our responses, this is a very difficult task. It is not a task someone who does not have a background in the field should dive into.

note: don't take this as me saying not to do any project. I'm saying ps times are pushing the limits of modern circuity. ns times, while not trivial, would be much easier to design and use. us would be even more preferable.
I do not know enough about lasers to speak to entry level projects
 
  • #20
Google found..
https://photonics.ixblue.com/files/files/pdf/EPG-200.pdf

25ps - 200ps Electrical Pulse/Impulse Generator

The EPG-200 is a specially-designed short electrical pulse generator. The output pulse can be as short as 25 ps, and with the high-voltage option, it can drive most off-the-shelf laser diodes or LN modulators to generate short optical pulses. The tunability of the pulse-width and frequency repetition rate offers flexibility in laser machining application, where control of laser pulse energy is required.

That's as near as I can find to what you asked about. I think if you want shorter pulses you will have to get a bit of kit that actually produces the optical pulses as well.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
I wonder how many frequencies (and what frequencies) one would need to mix to produce such pulses (1 ps/350 ps). Obviously for the pulse to be perfectly square wave one will need infinitely many, so the question is about practical limit of using such approach for pulse generation.

My gut feeling is that it could work for duty cycle close to 50%.
 
  • #22
Borek said:
I wonder how many frequencies (and what frequencies) one would need to mix to produce such pulses (1 ps/350 ps). Obviously for the pulse to be perfectly square wave one will need infinitely many, so the question is about practical limit of using such approach for pulse generation.

I'm a bit rusty but wouldn't they all have to be in the right phase relationship? If they are generated by separate oscillators that might be hard if post #7 is correct.
 

What is PWM?

PWM stands for Pulse Width Modulation. It is a digital signal that is used for controlling the amount of power given to a device. It is commonly used in electronic devices such as motors, LEDs, and audio amplifiers.

What is the duration of a PWM signal?

The duration of a PWM signal refers to the length of time that the signal is on or off. It is typically measured in units of time, such as milliseconds or microseconds. The duration of a PWM signal can vary depending on the application and the specific device being controlled.

What is the significance of a picosecond pulse width?

A picosecond pulse width refers to a very short duration of a PWM signal, specifically one trillionth of a second. This type of signal is used in high-speed applications, such as telecommunications and laser technology. It allows for precise control and fast switching of devices.

How is PWM duration determined?

The duration of a PWM signal is determined by the frequency at which it is being generated. The frequency can be adjusted by changing the pulse width or the duty cycle of the signal. The duty cycle is the percentage of time that the signal is on versus off, and it can be adjusted to control the duration of the signal.

What are the benefits of using a picosecond pulse width?

Using a picosecond pulse width in PWM signals allows for faster and more precise control of devices. It also reduces power consumption since the signal is only on for a very short amount of time. Additionally, it can reduce interference and noise in electronic systems.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
871
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top