B Q - Double slit experiment, delayed slit selection observation

Matt711
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The result of slit selection is shown on a PC monitor, observer does not see the result, is there an interference or particle pattern on a interference screen?
Do I see an interference pattern on a interference screen in Double slit experiment if there is a detector watching which slit photon went trough but the observer does not see the result of detector measurement?
Thanks :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No
 
BvU said:
No
why not?
 
Why would you expect a diffraction pattern?

:welcome: ##\qquad##!​

##\ ##
 
Matt711 said:
why not?
You have to have some sort of measuring device to determine which slit the particle went through if the PC is going to display that information on its screen. The interaction with that measuring device is an “observation” sufficient to collapse the wave function - it doesn’t matter whether a human being gets involved.

Many older threads here, such as https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...e-of-quantum-measurement.919279/#post-5796193
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and BvU
You don't even need to put something in the slits to have which-way information. It's sufficient to put the screen, where the particles are observed close enough to the double slits. It's easy to understand within the wave picture, why you don't see interference fringes: Due to Huygens's principle the wave behind the slits is given by the superposition of the spherical waves coming from each point in the slit openings. If you are close enough to the slits these spherical waves don't overlap there, and thus they do not interfere at the observation screen and you have which-way information for each particle. If you put the screen far away from the slits you get the usual Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, because the partial waves from the slits overlap at the screen and thus you can't know from which slit each of the individual particle came. In this sense you have a typical case of what Bohr called "complementarity": You can either observe "particle aspects" or "wave aspects" of the "quanta", depending on the choice of observation (in this case putting the observational screen close to or far from the slits. You can't have both aspects in one experiment, but of course you can put the observational screen somewhere in between. Then you have some "uncertain" which-way information and a somewhat "blurred" diffraction pattern.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top