Quantum Field Theory: The Why, What and How by T. Padmanabhan

In summary, Padmanabhan's book is a fresh and different take on QFT, different from most other existing QFT books. At the level of technical difficulty, it is comparable, but Peskin is somewhat more difficult. At the level of conceptual depth, I think Padmanabhan is much deeper.

For those who have used this book

  • Strongly Recommend

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Lightly Recommend

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6
  • #3
I would also like to know what are people's thoughts on this.
 
  • #4
I like this book because if offers a rather fresh view of QFT, different from most other existing QFT books. For instance, even though the book is written for high-energy physicists, it contains a lot of condensed-matter style of thinking, especially with respect to interpretation of UV divergences.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #5
Will maybe its a good supplement for Zee, and Peskin.
Just start with it alongside with Zee, and After finish it, go for Peskin, I think Padmanabhan is excellent writer, he have books about Astrophyiscs and Gravity.
 
  • #6
Demystifier said:
I like this book because if offers a rather fresh view of QFT, different from most other existing QFT books. For instance, even though the book is written for high-energy physicists, it contains a lot of condensed-matter style of thinking, especially with respect to interpretation of UV divergences.
What about the level of the textbook? Does it compare to Peskin's?
 
  • #7
Joker93 said:
What about the level of the textbook? Does it compare to Peskin's?
At the level of technical difficulty, it is comparable, but Peskin is somewhat more difficult. At the level of conceptual depth, I think Padmanabhan is much deeper.
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu and Joker93
  • #8
Joker93 said:
What about the level of the textbook? Does it compare to Peskin's?
You can say that this book is the Mini-version of Zee book,I really surprised in the way Padmanabhan explain things , you can't compare it to Peskin, since Peskin is about how to compute things, and this book is about how to think the right way in QFT, but if you mix these two together you'll be very Suprised that you learn QFT better.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, atyy and Douglas Sunday
  • #9
Demystifier said:
At the level of technical difficulty, it is comparable, but Peskin is somewhat more difficult. At the level of conceptual depth, I think Padmanabhan is much deeper.
A little off topic but, what do you think of Manoukian's two-volume textbook on Quantum Field theory?
 
  • #10
Moayd Shagaf said:
You can say that this book is the Mini-version of Zee book,I really surprised in the way Padmanabhan explain things , you can't compare it to Peskin, since Peskin is about how to compute things, and this book is about how to think the right way in QFT, but if you mix these two together you'll be very Suprised that you learn QFT better.
A little off topic but, what do you think of Manoukian's two-volume textbook on Quantum Field theory?
 
  • #11
Joker93 said:
A little off topic but, what do you think of Manoukian's two-volume textbook on Quantum Field theory?
I haven't seriously study it, mainly because my first impression was not very high. But I like the idea of the second volume to put the both major competitive approaches to quantum gravity in one book.
 
  • #12
Is Padmanabhan's book suitable as a supplement for a first course (Blundell, Schwarz, etc)?
 
  • #13
Whitehole said:
Is Padmanabhan's book suitable as a supplement for a first course (Blundell, Schwarz, etc)?
Yes it is, Trust me, Its a wonderful book to get idea what QFT is, its like zee without GUT and Application Chapters,
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
  • #14
Moayd Shagaf said:
Yes it is, Trust me, Its a wonderful book to get idea what QFT is, its like zee without GUT and Application Chapters,
A question. I have been through nearly all of Blundell's textbook (QFT for the gifted amateur) and a big chunk of Zee's QFT nutshell.
Do you think that Padmanabhan's has anything new to offer me? Or, do you think it is time to go to higher level textbooks or is Padmanabhan's textbook at an even slightly higher level than Blundell's and Zee's?
 
  • #15
Well, then I'd recommend to try Weinberg's three-volume set (starting with Vol. I of course).
 
  • #16
vanhees71 said:
Well, then I'd recommend to try Weinberg's three-volume set (starting with Vol. I of course).
I heard that Weinberg's volumes are even more advanced than Peskin's textbook though.
 
  • #17
Yes, but if you really worked through Blundell, I think you should be able to understand Weinberg already. If you think you need something in between, I'd rather recommend than M. Schwartz's book than Peskin&Schroeder. The only textbook, I'd not recommend is Zee's Nutshell. I find it pretty confusing since the nutshell chosen was too small to adequately cover the comprehensive amount of topics Zee aims to present.
 
  • #18
vanhees71 said:
Yes, but if you really worked through Blundell, I think you should be able to understand Weinberg already. If you think you need something in between, I'd rather recommend than M. Schwartz's book than Peskin&Schroeder. The only textbook, I'd not recommend is Zee's Nutshell. I find it pretty confusing since the nutshell chosen was too small to adequately cover the comprehensive amount of topics Zee aims to present.
Thanks.
And, how is the level of Padmanabhan's textbook compared to these?
 
  • #19
I don't know Padmanabhan's book yet. So I can't say anything about it.
 
  • #20
Joker93 said:
A question. I have been through nearly all of Blundell's textbook (QFT for the gifted amateur) and a big chunk of Zee's QFT nutshell.
Do you think that Padmanabhan's has anything new to offer me? Or, do you think it is time to go to higher level textbooks or is Padmanabhan's textbook at an even slightly higher level than Blundell's and Zee's?
Padmanabhan is at the level of zee and Blundell, If you study Padmanabhan and Zee, You must go for advanced book like Peskin, Weinberg is Complete but I think you must take it after Peskin, But another thing I need to say, I never study from Schwartz Book, but this doesn't mean you don't take it, people hear like it I think.
 
  • #21
Moayd Shagaf said:
Padmanabhan is at the level of zee and Blundell, If you study Padmanabhan and Zee, You must go for advanced book like Peskin, Weinberg is Complete but I think you must take it after Peskin, But another thing I need to say, I never study from Schwartz Book, but this doesn't mean you don't take it, people hear like it I think.
Truth is that I have been through Peskin' first two and a half chapters but did not like it a lot. I supplemented it with Tong's QFT lecture notes and it made things much better.
But, upon studying a few sections of Schwartz's textbook, I found it to be much better than Peskin's.
[Note that Maggiore's textbook is also nice although some chapters/sections are very brief to be of aby use(like the non-Abelian gauge theory part)]
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

1. What is Quantum Field Theory?

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is a theoretical framework that combines the principles of quantum mechanics and special relativity to describe the behavior of subatomic particles. It is considered to be the most fundamental and successful theory in physics, and is used to explain various phenomena such as the behavior of particles and their interactions.

2. Why is Quantum Field Theory important?

Quantum Field Theory is important because it provides a mathematical framework for understanding the behavior of particles and their interactions. It has been successfully used to make predictions that have been experimentally verified, and is considered to be the foundation of modern physics.

3. What are the main concepts of Quantum Field Theory?

The main concepts of Quantum Field Theory include fields, particles, and interactions. Fields are mathematical quantities that describe the behavior of particles, and particles are excitations of these fields. Interactions are described as the exchange of particles between fields, which results in the forces between particles.

4. How does Quantum Field Theory relate to other theories in physics?

Quantum Field Theory is considered to be the most fundamental theory in physics, as it combines the principles of quantum mechanics and special relativity, which are the two pillars of modern physics. It also provides a framework for understanding and unifying other theories such as electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, and strong nuclear force.

5. What are the challenges in understanding and studying Quantum Field Theory?

One of the main challenges in understanding Quantum Field Theory is its complex mathematical formalism, which requires a strong background in advanced mathematics. Additionally, the theory has some conceptual challenges, such as the interpretation of virtual particles and the problem of renormalization. However, with continued research and advancements, these challenges can be overcome to gain a deeper understanding of the theory.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
557
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
476
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top