A Quantum linear code/ Dual Code (CSS) proof

steve1763
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
What would the proof be for the following identity? I cannot find the proof anywhere
Screenshot 2021-09-05 at 21.52.33.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How should we know, what your symbols mean? You have to give a bit more information or a link to the paper you are referring too.
 
If ##x\in C^\perp## then it is clear. If not, then there is a ##c_0\in C## such that ##x\cdot c_0 =1##. The you have

##
-1\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=(-1)^{x\cdot c_0}\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot (c-c_0)}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}
##

The last equality is because ##C## is a subspace.
 
Last edited:
martinbn said:
If ##x\in C^\perp## then it is clear. If not, then there is a ##c_0\in C## such that ##x\cdot c_0 =1##. The you have

##
-1\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=(-1)^{x\cdot c}\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot (c-c_0)}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}
##

The last equality is because ##C## is a subspace.
Thank you very much
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top