Question about the ending to 2001: A Space Odyssey

  • Thread starter donglepuss
  • Start date
  • #1
donglepuss
17
4
In 2001, does bowman get transported to distant galaxies far outside of the observable universe by the monolith?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
donglepuss said:
In 2001, does bowman get transported to distant galaxies far outside of the observable universe by the monolith?
That depends on whether you watch the movie or read the book. The movie is quite clear that he's going far far beyond anywhere we can imagine. The book is more vague. I don't have the book any more (dang it!) but I think there was a mention of a galactic cluster, but that could easily have been within our own Galaxy. 3001 implies that the entities that created the monolith were local to this Galaxy, but that could be outside of what Clarke's original intentions were.

-Dan
 
  • #3
I figured he was on Jupiter and then went back to Earth.
 
  • #4
donglepuss said:
does bowman get transported to distant galaxies
As I recall it's not really specified. There is maybe a mention that the physical side of the alien entity is already obsolete/discarded, and that might imply a not exactly physical 'distance' for the trip, but there is no actual answer ( ... which I know about).

In the 3001 book it is hinted that the monolit might be still part of the physical side of the entities and is constrained by light speed
(thus the issue about the extermination command sent back with 900 years of delay based on our mid-XX. century...)
 
  • #5
Algr said:
I figured he was on Jupiter and then went back to Earth.
Actually, in the book he was out at Saturn. It made more sense, really: Clarke said that the creation of the monolith at Saturn is what destroyed the moon that created the rings. But that didn't work well with the plot of the second book, which took place at Jupiter.

There's a Trivial Pursuit question about this that I flummox the questioner with: The card asks which planet Discovery went to but doesn't mention if it's asking about the book or the movie.

-Dan
 
  • #6
Clarke’s views are not definitive - he co-wrote the screenplay with Stanley Kubrick, with the novel releases after the movie.
 
  • #7
donglepuss said:
In 2001, does bowman get transported to distant galaxies far outside of the observable universe by the monolith?
If I remember correctly, he was transported to a Holiday Inn.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy
  • #8
donglepuss said:
In 2001, does bowman get transported to distant galaxies far outside of the observable universe by the monolith?
Reading the book and watching the film both gave my the impression that he sorta transcended our "mundane" reality". Much like those civilizations in Ian M. Banks' books who just sorta "drop out of reality".

I mean he's sorta here there and everywhere at the same time. Like in the 4th dimension or some such.

In the book I remember he "travels" back to Earth to visit his mom one last time and, on the way, triggers a thermonuclear device commenting on the crude construction of the weapon.
 
  • #9
Having read 3001 last week, I can tell you that the consciousness of Bowman was absorbed by a large alien device. We are told that the aliens are limited by the speed of light. So no go on extragalactic or even extrasolar.
 

1. What is the meaning of the ending to 2001: A Space Odyssey?

The ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey is open to interpretation and has been the subject of much debate among viewers and critics. Some believe that it represents a transformation or rebirth of humanity, while others see it as a commentary on the evolution of technology.

2. How does the ending tie into the rest of the film?

The ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey ties into the rest of the film thematically, as it explores the concept of human evolution and the potential for advancement through technology. It also ties into the film's exploration of the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence.

3. Why is the ending so ambiguous?

The ambiguity of the ending to 2001: A Space Odyssey is intentional, as director Stanley Kubrick wanted to leave it open to interpretation and encourage viewers to think critically about the themes and messages of the film. This ambiguity also adds to the film's overall sense of mystery and wonder.

4. Is there a definitive answer to the meaning of the ending?

No, there is no definitive answer to the meaning of the ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey. As mentioned, it is open to interpretation and can be viewed in different ways depending on the viewer's perspective. Kubrick himself never gave a definitive explanation for the ending.

5. How does the ending challenge traditional storytelling?

The ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey challenges traditional storytelling by leaving the audience with more questions than answers. It also subverts expectations by not providing a clear resolution or explanation, forcing viewers to think and interpret the ending for themselves.

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
48
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
812
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
65
Views
37K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
924
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top