Quotient of the Mutlplicative Monoid of a Ring

In summary: From your paper, it seems like there is no simple answer. Thanks for your help!In summary, the conversation discusses the use of congruence relations in quotient spaces for monoids and their relationship to normal subgroups in groups and ideals in rings. The focus is on the structure of the quotient monoid M/~, where ~ represents the associate equivalence relation. It is mentioned that this is a difficult question and there is no simple answer, with a paper being referenced for a classification of such groups.
  • #1
lugita15
1,554
15
In abstract algebra (ring theory specifically), when we are dealing with factorization, UFD's, and so on, we are often only interested in the multiplicative structure of the ring, not the additive structure. So here is the basic situation we face: we a start with an integral domain (R,+,*) (i.e. a commutative ring with no zero divisors). Then from that we take the multiplicative monoid (M,*) where M = R - {0}. What structure does M have? It's a commutative monoid with the cancellation property: ab=ac implies b=c. (A monoid is a set endowed with an operation that is associative and has an identity.)

But we're still not done! In the context of factorization and associated topics, we also don't care about multiplication by units (invertible elements). We call two elements a and b of M "associates" if a=bu for some unit u. So my question is, can we usefully construct out of M yet another structure which consists of equivalence classes under the associate equivalence relation?

You can take a quotient of a group with a subset if the subset is a normal subgroup. You can take a quotient of a ring with a subset if the subset is an ideal. So what is the condition that a subset of a monoid has to satisfy in order to be able to construct a quotient monoid? And whatever the condition is, does the group G of units of M satisfy this condition, so that M/G would be our quotient monoid, and would be the quotient of M under the associate equivalence relation? And assuming that we are allowed to form the quotient monoid M/G, what is the structure of this monoid?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Group theory and ring theory are very peculiar theories if you want to look at quotient spaces. The idea is that that you quotient by a normal subgroup/ideal. However, with other algebraic object, things are not that simple. Sure, there exists a notion of quotient spaces, but it is not just quotienting by a "subset" of the space.

The idea is to use so called congruence relations. With a monoid M, a congruence relation is an equivalence relation [itex]\sim[/itex] on M, such that if [itex]x\sim y[/itex] and [itex]a\sim b[/itex], then [itex]ax\sim by[/itex].
We can then look at [itex]M/\sim[/itex], the set of quotient classes. This turns out to be a monoid under the operation [itex][a]*=[ab][/itex].

Notice, that with groups and rings, the notion of congruence relation also makes sense. For example, a congruence relation on a group is an equivalence relation [itex]\sim[/itex] such that

  • If [itex]x\sim y[/itex] and [itex]a\sim b[/itex], then [itex]ax\sim by[/itex]
  • If [itex]x\sim y[/itex], then [itex]x^{-1}\sim y^{-1}[/itex]

So given such an equivalence relation, we can form a quotient group [itex]G/\sim[/itex].
However, it turns out that there is a bijection between the congruence relations and normal subgroups. Indeed, given a normal subgroup N, we can say that [itex]x\sim y[/itex] if and only if [itex]xy^{-1}\in N[/itex].
Conversely, given a congruence relation [itex]\sim[/itex], we can form a normal subgroup [itex]N=\{x\in G~\vert~x\sim e\}[/itex].
So the quotient groups with the congruence relations are exactly the quotient groups by normal subgroups. The same thing holds for rings.

However, the theory of congruence relations has the benefit that it is applicable to other algebraic structures such as monoids, semigroups, lattices, etc. Furthermore, what is also nice is that versions of the isomorphism theorems hold in general for congruence relations as well. All of this is studied in "universal algebra".
 
  • #3
Thanks micromass! Clearly the associate equivalence relation is a congruence relation on M (a commutative monoid with cancellation property). So now my only question is, what is the structure of quotient monoid M/~ where a~b means a and b are associates, i.e. a=bu for some unit u? I don't really know monoid theory (if there is such a field), so I don't know how I would go about doing it.
 
  • #4
lugita15 said:
Thanks micromass! Clearly the associate equivalence relation is a congruence relation on M (a commutative monoid with cancellation property). So now my only question is, what is the structure of quotient monoid M/~ where a~b means a and b are associates, i.e. a=bu for some unit u? I don't really know monoid theory (if there is such a field), so I don't know how I would go about doing it.

I don't think this is such an easy question. A somewhat easier question we can ask ourself: if F is a field, then what is the structure of the group [itex]F\setminus \{0\}[/itex]. For finite fields, this is easy: the groups are exactly the cyclic groups of order [itex]p^n-1[/itex] with p prime.
For infinite fields, things are somewhat harder. This paper classifies such groups: http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete/Dicker1966.pdf but the classification does not seem to be very nice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
micromass, I didn't really mean how would you classify the structure of M/~ upto isomorphism. I was just asking informally, what are the properties of M/~? In other words, what are the general properties of a commutative monoid with cancellation property and no nontrivial units?
 

1. What is the definition of the "quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring"?

The quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring is a mathematical concept that refers to the set of all possible divisions within a ring, where the elements are considered up to a given equivalence relation. In simpler terms, it is a way to divide elements within a ring and group them together based on a specific rule.

2. How is the quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring calculated?

The quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring is calculated by first defining an equivalence relation on the elements of the ring. This relation determines which elements are considered equivalent and can be grouped together. Then, the elements of the ring are divided according to this relation, resulting in the quotient set.

3. What is the significance of the quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring?

The quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring is an important mathematical concept because it allows us to study the structure of a ring in a more simplified and organized way. It also helps us understand the relationships and patterns between different elements within a ring.

4. How does the quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring relate to other mathematical concepts?

The quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring is closely related to other mathematical concepts such as group theory and algebraic structures. It also has applications in various fields, such as number theory, cryptography, and computer science.

5. Can the quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring be applied to real-world problems?

Yes, the quotient of the multiplicative monoid of a ring has applications in various real-world problems, such as coding theory, data compression, and error-correcting codes. It also has practical applications in areas like economics and physics.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
731
Back
Top