Railgun: Significant magnetic field where projectile is?

  • #1
greypilgrim
513
36
Hi.
Very simplified schematics of railguns all look like this:
Railgun-1.svg.png

I have trouble properly understanding this. So apparently there is still a significant magnetic field where the projectile is, even though that's where the current stops flowing through the rails? Of course the magnetic field doesn't just stop there, there's a fringe field, but that has to be a lot weaker than the magnetic field between two wires far from the ends, doesn't it?

Would it make sense to build the projectile like this to move the crossing wire further inside the magnetic field:
Railgun-3.svg.png

Of course, the parts of the projectile (anti-)parallel to the rails would create an opposing magnetic field. But since this field is created by the projectile itself, it shouldn't be taken into account for the Lorentz force acting on the projectile. Or should it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you clarify the second configuration? Are the orange conductors that parallel the black rails insulated from those rails, or in electrical contact with them? If they're in contact, isn't this the same as the first configuration, just with slightly thicker rails ahead of the projectile?
 
  • #3
They are part of the projectile and insulated from the rails, apart from the very front where there's contact (at the places where the projectile in the initial configuration was).

EDIT: I uploaded a clarified version.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
But the orange current flowing anti-parallel to the black current will cancel, so no net increase in the field past the projectile.
 
  • #5
That's what I was wondering, does the field created by the anti-parallel parts count when calculating the Lorentz force onto the projectile? Wouldn't that mean that the orange part would create a net force on itself, contradicting 3rd Newton?

Imagine we only have the isolated orange part at rest, but with a huge inital charge separation that leads to a current. That shouldn't start moving, should it?
Railgun-4.svg.png
 
  • #6
greypilgrim said:
does the field created by the anti-parallel parts count when calculating the Lorentz force onto the projectile?
It cancels the force from the black wire next to it. You can say that they each create an opposite force, if you like. I prefer to say that there is no net current in that area so no field is created, but it is ultimately the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #7
greypilgrim said:
That's what I was wondering, does the field created by the anti-parallel parts count when calculating the Lorentz force onto the projectile? Wouldn't that mean that the orange part would create a net force on itself, contradicting 3rd Newton?
Yes, the "anti-parallel parts count". On your diagram, I've marked non-existent magnetic field loops with red Xs:
1699127582316.png

The field in that region is zero because the net current through those loops vanishes: the black and orange currents are antiparallel and exactly balance to zero. So the only region of magnetic field propelling the projectile is behind it. Your "alternative" is really just the standard railgun.
 
  • #8
Okay, thanks. I think my question comes down to the thought experiment in #5. I refined it a bit and formulated it more clearly in this other thread.
 
  • #9
greypilgrim said:
Okay, thanks. I think my question comes down to the thought experiment in #5. I refined it a bit and formulated it more clearly in this other thread.
This thread here is now closed. Please continue the discussion in that other thread. Thanks.
 

1. How does a railgun work?

A railgun works by using a significant magnetic field to accelerate a projectile along a pair of conductive rails. When a large electrical current is passed through the rails, it creates a magnetic field that pushes the projectile forward at extremely high speeds.

2. What are the advantages of using a railgun?

Some advantages of using a railgun include high projectile velocities, long range capabilities, and minimal reliance on chemical propellants. Additionally, railguns have the potential to be more cost-effective and environmentally friendly compared to traditional firearms.

3. What are the limitations of railguns?

Some limitations of railguns include high power requirements, significant heat generation, and complex engineering challenges. Additionally, railguns may require advanced cooling systems to prevent overheating during rapid firing.

4. Are railguns currently used in military applications?

While railgun technology has been developed for military applications, it is not yet widely deployed in operational systems. Research and development efforts are ongoing to improve the performance and reliability of railgun systems for potential future use in military settings.

5. How does the magnetic field in a railgun affect the projectile's trajectory?

The significant magnetic field in a railgun plays a crucial role in accelerating the projectile along the rails and guiding its trajectory towards the target. By controlling the strength and direction of the magnetic field, operators can adjust the flight path of the projectile to achieve greater accuracy and precision.

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
700
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
963
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
9K
Back
Top