Researchers create gravity in lab experiment

In summary, scientists funded by the European Space Agency have conducted an experiment in a laboratory that has revealed the gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field. This effect, called the Gravitomagnetic London Moment, was measured using a superconducting gyroscope spinning at high speeds. The results were much larger than expected and may help in the development of a quantum theory of gravity. The researchers also found that this effect could be explained by assuming that gravitons, the force-carrying particles of gravity, gain mass in a similar way to photons in superconductors. However, further confirmation and replication of the results is needed before this can be considered a major breakthrough. The results were presented at a conference and are currently being considered for publication.
  • #1
SF
Scientists funded by the European Space Agency have measured the gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field for the first time in a laboratory. Under certain special conditions the effect is much larger than expected from general relativity and could help physicists to make a significant step towards the long-sought-after quantum theory of gravity.

Just as a moving electrical charge creates a magnetic field, so a moving mass generates a gravitomagnetic field. According to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, the effect is virtually negligible. However, Martin Tajmar, ARC Seibersdorf Research GmbH, Austria; Clovis de Matos, ESA-HQ, Paris; and colleagues have measured the effect in a laboratory.

Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6 500 times a minute. Superconductors are special materials that lose all electrical resistance at a certain temperature. Spinning superconductors produce a weak magnetic field, the so-called London moment. The new experiment tests a conjecture by Tajmar and de Matos that explains the difference between high-precision mass measurements of Cooper-pairs (the current carriers in superconductors) and their prediction via quantum theory. They have discovered that this anomaly could be explained by the appearance of a gravitomagnetic field in the spinning superconductor (This effect has been named the Gravitomagnetic London Moment by analogy with its magnetic counterpart).

Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism. "This experiment is the gravitational analogue of Faraday's electromagnetic induction experiment in 1831.

It demonstrates that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil. Depending on further confirmation, this effect could form the basis for a new technological domain, which would have numerous applications in space and other high-tech sectors" says de Matos. Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts. Initially, the researchers were reluctant to believe their own results.

"We ran more than 250 experiments, improved the facility over 3 years and discussed the validity of the results for 8 months before making this announcement. Now we are confident about the measurement," says Tajmar, who performed the experiments and hopes that other physicists will conduct their own versions of the experiment in order to verify the findings and rule out a facility induced effect.

In parallel to the experimental evaluation of their conjecture, Tajmar and de Matos also looked for a more refined theoretical model of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment. They took their inspiration from superconductivity. The electromagnetic properties of superconductors are explained in quantum theory by assuming that force-carrying particles, known as photons, gain mass. By allowing force-carrying gravitational particles, known as the gravitons, to become heavier, they found that the unexpectedly large gravitomagnetic force could be modeled.

"If confirmed, this would be a major breakthrough," says Tajmar, "it opens up a new means of investigating general relativity and it consequences in the quantum world."

The results were presented at a one-day conference at ESA's European Space and Technology Research Centre (ESTEC), in the Netherlands, 21 March 2006. Two papers detailing the work are now being considered for publication. The papers can be accessed on-line at the Los Alamos pre-print server using the references: gr-qc/0603033 and gr-qc/0603032.

From European Space Agency

http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/scientists_find_evidence_for_artifical_gravity_10282.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3


This is an exciting development in the field of physics and has the potential to make a significant contribution towards understanding the nature of gravity. The fact that the researchers were able to create a gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field in a laboratory setting is truly remarkable. This discovery could potentially pave the way for further experiments and research on quantum gravity and its implications.

The results of this experiment also highlight the importance of funding scientific research, as it allows for groundbreaking discoveries such as this one. It is encouraging to see the European Space Agency supporting this research and providing a platform for the findings to be shared with the scientific community.

The potential applications of this discovery, such as in space technology, further demonstrate the practical benefits that can arise from fundamental scientific research. It will be interesting to see how this new understanding of gravitomagnetism will be incorporated into future studies and how it may impact our understanding of the universe.

Overall, this is a significant step forward in our understanding of gravity and its behavior. We look forward to seeing further developments and confirmations of these findings in the future.
 

1. How did researchers create gravity in a lab experiment?

Researchers were able to create gravity in a lab experiment by using a device called a centrifuge. This device spins at a high speed, creating a centrifugal force that mimics the effects of gravity. By adjusting the speed of the centrifuge, researchers were able to simulate different levels of gravity.

2. Why did researchers create gravity in a lab experiment?

Creating gravity in a lab experiment allows scientists to study the effects of different levels of gravity on objects and living organisms. This can help us better understand the impact of gravity on our bodies and how it affects various processes, such as cell growth and development.

3. What were the results of the lab experiment on creating gravity?

The results of the lab experiment showed that objects and living organisms experience changes in their behavior and function in different levels of gravity. For example, plants grown in simulated zero gravity conditions showed different growth patterns compared to those grown in normal gravity.

4. Could this experiment lead to the creation of artificial gravity?

While this lab experiment was able to simulate gravity, it is still a long way from creating artificial gravity. The device used in the experiment is only able to produce a small amount of gravitational force, whereas for artificial gravity to be feasible, a much stronger force would be needed.

5. What implications does this lab experiment have for space exploration?

This lab experiment has significant implications for space exploration as it allows us to better understand the effects of different levels of gravity on human health and the growth of plants and other organisms. This information can help in designing and planning long-term space missions and the potential for future human settlements on other planets.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
995
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
309
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
666
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
503
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
200
Back
Top