Resistive force against a bullet

In summary, the principle of conservation of energy states that the energy that goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
  • #1
Deckname
6
0
Homework Statement
A bullet of mass 20g hits a steel plate at 600m/s and ricochets in the direction of CD at 500m/s. The bullet makes an indentation in the plate of length 50mm with an entering and exiting angle of beta. The angle alpha between the leaving velocity vector and the horizon is 30°

Calculate the average force of resistance the steel plate is providing the bullet with.

Solution: 9.46x10^7 N
Relevant Equations
(1/2)mv^2
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
 

Attachments

  • 20190411_232610.jpg
    20190411_232610.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 219
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Deckname said:
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
"Force of resistance" may be ambiguous. The plate resists being penetrated, so it might mean the average force exerted.

Imagine the bullet had entered a smoothly curving tube, deflecting the bullet with no loss of speed. Would you conclude the tube had exerted no force on the bullet?

(But I get a smaller answer too.)

Edit: are you sure the bullet is initially moving horizontally?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hey, thanks for the reply. Appreciate it.

I translated this problem from my native language, but yeah I'm not too sure either, but literally translated it means calculate the middle force of resistance, which I suppose means the average force of resistance, if we assume the force of friction getting lower the less momentum the bullet has, if that's how it works. I have to admit, I don't have a strong background in physics and have only started learning it a year ago, depending on what my course requires me.

I tried a different approach though, I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time. And arrived at pretty much the same result I have already posted in my picture.

Regarding the entering angle of the velocity vector, it doesn't explicitly state that it's horizontal, but I can clearly see it in the picture I drew it from.

Also, there's a fair possibility that the solution provided by my teacher is wrong, since this is the case with a few other problems I've been assigned as well. But then again, usually the answers deviate by a few hundreds of Newtons sometimes, and not by a few orders of a magnitude like here, so that's what's getting me worked up.

I can't seem to get nowhere near his answer, assuming it's correct.
 
  • #4
Deckname said:
I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time.
That is the better approach, but as you say it only leads to 66000N, not 108N. Indeed, even if the bullet bounced straight back, causing a 5mm indent, all at constant speed, you would still not get to 108.

I wondered if your teacher had forgotten to square root somewhere, but that seems to give even larger numbers.
 

1. What is resistive force against a bullet?

Resistive force against a bullet is the force that opposes the motion of a bullet as it travels through a medium, such as air or water.

2. What factors affect resistive force against a bullet?

The factors that affect resistive force against a bullet include the shape and speed of the bullet, the density and composition of the medium it is traveling through, and the surface area of the bullet.

3. How does resistive force affect the trajectory of a bullet?

Resistive force can cause a bullet to slow down and change direction, leading to a curved trajectory. The greater the resistive force, the more pronounced the effect on the bullet's trajectory.

4. Can resistive force be used to improve accuracy of a bullet?

Yes, resistive force can be used to improve the accuracy of a bullet by reducing its speed and making it less susceptible to external factors, such as wind or gravity.

5. How do scientists measure resistive force against a bullet?

Scientists use various methods, such as high-speed cameras and pressure sensors, to measure the resistive force against a bullet as it travels through a medium. They can also use mathematical models and simulations to estimate the resistive force and its effects on the bullet's trajectory.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
930
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
921
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
333
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
323
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
619
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
592
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
361
Back
Top