Sensitivity of lock-in amplifier

AI Thread Summary
The sensitivity of a lock-in amplifier is not universally defined, but it generally refers to the ratio of the minimum usable signal to noise ratio. This concept is closely related to the traditional definition of dynamical reserve, which measures the largest tolerable noise signal against the full-scale signal. The discussion highlights that sensitivity can be expressed mathematically, with sensitivity defined as the inverse of the voltage gain applied to the input signal. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of phase locking in optimizing signal recovery from noise. Overall, while there is no single accepted definition, sensitivity is linked to signal amplification and noise management in lock-in amplifiers.
freddyfish
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hey

I have a quick question whose answer is well-hidden on google since the key word of the search attempts is sensitivity, which of course returns results about phase-sensitive detection, and seemingly phase-sensitive detection only... My question is what the exact definition of the sensitivity of a lock-in amplifier is.

cheers :biggrin:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No offers yet ?


A question well phrased is half answered.
And I'm not sure I know either what would be meant by "sensitivity" of a lock-in amplifier.

They have an ability to recover a weak signal out of strong noise. Probably a practical definition would be an approximate ratio of the minimum useable signal to noise ratio, but I'm kinda guessing.

Since a lock-in amplifier is effectively multiplying two signals, and how well that works depends on the phase between them, they employ "Phase Locking" to optimize.
And that's not a straightforward subject.

Try searching on terms"PLL capture ratio"

and peruse this practical article:
http://www.bentham.co.uk/pdf/F225.pdf

maybe you'll elaborate on where you ran across the term.
 
There is plenty (and very good) information about lock-in amplifiers, so I have read my fair share. Therefore I have got an intuition what the sensitivity of the lock-in amplifier would specify, but this wasn't enough for a reliable conclusion.

Your guess makes sense, but the ratio mentioned is actually the traditional definition of dynamical reserve, which is the ratio of the largest tolerable noise signal to the full-scale signal.

Back to the question. I found an "extended" manual where the following were presented:

Vout = 10A_e(A_vV_icosØ+Vos) {if the output is X}

where...
A_e= 1 or 10 per the Expand
A_v= 1/Sensitivity
V_i= magnitude of the signal
Ø = phase between signal & reference
V_os = offset (fraction of FS < 1.024)

:smile:
 
freddyfish said:
There is plenty (and very good) information about lock-in amplifiers, so I have read my fair share. Therefore I have got an intuition what the sensitivity of the lock-in amplifier would specify, but this wasn't enough for a reliable conclusion.

Your guess makes sense, but the ratio mentioned is actually the traditional definition of dynamical reserve, which is the ratio of the largest tolerable noise signal to the full-scale signal.

Back to the question. I found an "extended" manual where the following were presented:

Vout = 10A_e(A_vV_icosØ+Vos) {if the output is X}

where...
A_e= 1 or 10 per the Expand
A_v= 1/Sensitivity
V_i= magnitude of the signal
Ø = phase between signal & reference
V_os = offset (fraction of FS < 1.024)

:smile:

Intuition usually gets one close -- even if pointed in wrong direction !

Where there's not a universally accepted term for something, authors will often use what is intuitive to them. Is this an old reference, perhaps from 60's ?

Looking at your equation, my intuition tells me the author uses A_v for "Amplification(of) Voltage"

which is a term I used to run across way back when... it meant simply Voltage Gain.
The product of V_i and reference is product of their magnitudes X cos(angle)
i'll guess V_i is multiplied by A_v before arrival at the multiplier
and magnitude of reference is accounted for by A_e

So, 'sensitivity' to that author is simply: 1/(gain applied to input signal)

but that's just what feels intuitive to me.

I'm not well versed in lock-in amps as you have doubtless discerned.
My 'Rock of Ages' for this subject is the AD630 datasheet. It provides precise A_v of 1, 2, 3 or 4 before presentation to multiplier..

http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD630.pdf

that's my best stab at it - doubtless there's somebody here more expert.

old jim
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top