Should NYC High Schools Ban Geometric Proofs?

In summary, banning proofs in high school geometry is a bad idea that may have negative consequences for students.
  • #1
mathdad
1,283
1
Most high schools in NYC have banned direct and indirect geometric proofs. Too many complaints from parents and schools in fear of a lawsuit decided to disregard proofs in geometry. Good idea? Bad idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I believe that banning direct and indirect geometric proofs in high schools in NYC is a bad idea.

Geometry is an important branch of mathematics that helps develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Proofs are an essential part of geometry as they require students to use logic and reasoning to justify their statements. By banning proofs, students are deprived of an important tool for developing analytical and logical thinking.

Moreover, proofs are not only important in geometry but also in other fields of science and engineering. They teach students how to analyze and evaluate evidence, which is crucial for any scientific investigation. By removing proofs from the curriculum, students may struggle to understand and apply these skills in other subjects.

Additionally, banning proofs may also hinder students' ability to understand and appreciate the beauty and elegance of mathematics. Proofs are not just a means to an end, but they also showcase the beauty and simplicity of mathematical concepts. By removing them, students may miss out on the deeper understanding and appreciation of mathematics.

Furthermore, banning proofs may also send the message that it is acceptable to ignore evidence and logic in decision-making. In a world where critical thinking and problem-solving skills are highly valued, this could have negative consequences for students in their future endeavors.

In conclusion, as a scientist, I believe that banning direct and indirect geometric proofs in high schools in NYC is a bad idea. It deprives students of an important tool for developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, understanding the beauty of mathematics, and may have negative consequences for their future endeavors. Instead, efforts should be made to improve the teaching and understanding of proofs in geometry.
 

1. What are geometric proofs?

Geometric proofs are a method of proving mathematical statements using logical deductions and the properties of geometric shapes and figures. They involve a series of steps that demonstrate the validity of a given statement.

2. Why would NYC high schools consider banning geometric proofs?

There are a few reasons why NYC high schools may consider banning geometric proofs. One reason could be that they are seen as too difficult or time-consuming for students to learn and understand. Another reason could be to make room for other topics or subjects in the curriculum.

3. What are the potential benefits of banning geometric proofs?

The potential benefits of banning geometric proofs could include freeing up time for other topics, reducing stress on students, and allowing for a more diverse curriculum. It could also potentially encourage students to think outside the box and approach problem-solving in different ways.

4. What are the potential drawbacks of banning geometric proofs?

The potential drawbacks of banning geometric proofs could include losing an important analytical and problem-solving skill, as well as potentially limiting students' understanding of geometry and other mathematical concepts. It could also hinder students' ability to pursue careers in fields that heavily rely on geometry, such as engineering and architecture.

5. Is there a compromise between banning and keeping geometric proofs in NYC high schools?

Yes, there could be a compromise between completely banning and keeping geometric proofs in NYC high schools. This could involve incorporating them into the curriculum in a more practical and applicable way, rather than just as a standalone topic. It could also involve providing additional support and resources for students who struggle with geometric proofs.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
926
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
1
Views
956
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
825
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
992
Back
Top