Show that a partial molar property is an intensive property

mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Show that a partial molar property is an intensive property
Relevant Equations
Intensive property ##I##: ##\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} (\frac{\partial I}{\partial n_i}n_i)=0##
Extensive property ##E##: ##\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} (\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}n_i)=E##
Partial molar property for an extensive property ##E##: ##E^{(p)}_i=(\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i})##
I started by taking a derivative:
$$E = \sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} (E_i^{(p)} n_i) \ \ \ | \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial n_i}$$
$$\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}=\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} [\frac{\partial E_i^{(p)}}{\partial n_i}n_i + E_i^{(p)} \frac{\partial n_i}{\partial n_i}]$$
$$\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}=\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} [\frac{\partial E_i^{(p)}}{\partial n_i}n_i + E_i^{(p)}]$$
$$\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}=\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} [\frac{\partial E_i^{(p)}}{\partial n_i}n_i + (\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i})]$$
$$\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i} - E=\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} [\frac{\partial E_i^{(p)}}{\partial n_i}n_i ]$$
I'm not sure what to do know. I also have a question regarding theleft hand side -- does ##E## defined as ##E =\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} (\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}n_i)## depend on ##n_i##? Or is ##\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_i}## equal to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful with your indices. If
E = Σif(ni)
it does not follow that
dE/dni = Σidf(ni)/dni
You want to use a different index label and say
dE/dnj = Σidf(ni)/dnj for a given j.
 
mjc123 said:
Be careful with your indices. If
E = Σif(ni)
it does not follow that
dE/dni = Σidf(ni)/dni
You want to use a different index label and say
dE/dnj = Σidf(ni)/dnj for a given j.
Thank you! That looks much better now.
Now I get
$$\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_j}=\sum_{i=1}^{\alpha} [\frac{\partial E_j^{(p)}}{\partial n_i}n_i ]$$
And I'm still confused as to what ##\frac{\partial E}{\partial n_j}## is and how to deal with this term.
 
There is a very interesting derivation of this in Chapter 11, Smith and Van Ness, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics.
 
mcas said:
Now I get
$$\frac {\partial E} {\partial n_j} = \sum_{i=1}^α[\frac {\partial E_j^{(p)}} {\partial n_i}ni]$$
No, that should be
$$\frac {\partial E} {\partial n_j} = \sum_{i=1}^α[\frac {\partial E_i^{(p)}} {\partial n_j}ni + E_i^{(p)}\frac {\partial n_i} {\partial n_j}]$$
I don't know if you're on the right lines with the proof, I'm just correcting your notation.
 
mjc123 said:
No, that should be
$$\frac {\partial E} {\partial n_j} = \sum_{i=1}^α[\frac {\partial E_i^{(p)}} {\partial n_j}ni + E_i^{(p)}\frac {\partial n_i} {\partial n_j}]$$
I don't know if you're on the right lines with the proof, I'm just correcting your notation.
Thank you! Now I just need to express ##\frac {\partial n_i} {\partial n_j}## as ##\delta_{ij}## and it's proven.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top