Simple Particle Motion (Dynamics)

AI Thread Summary
A particle of mass 3.2kg initially moves due west at 6m/s, while another particle of mass 1.6kg moves due north at 5.0m/s. After 2 seconds, the first particle changes direction to N 30° E with a velocity of 3m/s, prompting a calculation for the second particle's new velocity. The momentum conservation equation Δp1 = -Δp2 is applied, but the calculated result for the second particle's velocity is disputed due to potential misprints in the exercise text. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying angles and calculations, as well as the common occurrence of errors in textbooks.
dunn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass 3.2kg is moving due west with a velocity of 6m/s. Another particle of mass 1.6kg is moving due north with a velocity of 5.0m/s. The two particles are interacting. After 2s the first particle is moving in the direction N 30° E with a velocity of 3m/s. Find the magnitude and direction of the second particle.

Homework Equations



Δp1 = -Δp2

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I have all the information I need except that I need to decompose the direction of v1' (i.e. the velocity of the first particle after the interaction) into coordinates along the x and y axes.

Here is my data:

v1 = -6i
v1' = 3(cos(60)i+sin(60)j) = 1.5i +2.6j
v2 = 5j
v2' = ?

I write m1(v1' - v1) = -m2(v2' - v2) (i.e. Δp1 = -Δp2)

Solving for v2' I get:

(m1(v1 - v1')/m2) + v2 = v2'

I put in the relevant data and get:

-15i -0.2j = v2'

But apparently this isn't correct. I keep checking my equation against the provided answer but I can't see where my mistake is even though I know my answer is wrong. I think I made a mistake when I decomposed the vector but I don't see how.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I think the book has (YET ANOTHER!) misprint and the angle should actually be N 23° E rather than N 30° E. Could someone verify this for me? It's late, I'm tired, and maybe I made an error.

(I need a new exercise text).
 
Last edited:
Verify it? If you write your answer using N 23° E in the calculation, then I can say if I agree with you. But since you have the provided answer, you could just check against that.

Also, your answer using N 30° E looks correct to me. And nicely set out, which is good. I'm not familiar with the notation N 30° E, but I guess it is supposed to mean 30 degrees clockwise from north, by the way you have answered the question. Maybe your exercise book meant it to be something else, which is why you get a different answer to them. Or it could just be as you say, they might have misprinted. It is annoying when that happens.
 
Yes, N 30° E means 30 degrees clockwise from the north direction.

The problem is that the book only gives simple numerical answers so I can't check to see if I did anything wrong in particular. With this exercise there were others associated tasks (finding the change in momentum of the particles and such) which show the exact same answer as mine for N 30° E, yet the given answer to the main problem that I posted here (find the momentum of the second particle) is clearly wrong. Oh well. At least I practiced finding angles given magnitudes and direction. :biggrin:
 
I've checked it twice, and there is also all the checking you have done, so I'm pretty certain you've done the method correctly. And yes, the practice of this is the main thing. There always are at least a few misprints in textbooks. You wouldn't think it was so difficult to get rid of them all, but apparently it is.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top