Simplified Afshar experiment: many-worlds interpretation

In summary, the experiment involves spliting a laser beam into two coherent beams that are made to intersect at right angles. By blocking the beams before they reach the intersection point and placing a thin absorber, it is observed that the beams "leap-frog" the absorber and detectors A and B detect photons at the same time. This suggests the possibility of parallel worlds and shadow photons, but further research and consideration of potential flaws are necessary for interpretation.
  • #1
johne1618
371
0
Hi,

I would be interested in what people think of the following experiment.

Imagine a laser beam is split into two coherent beams A and B that are made to cross each other at right-angles. Beyond the point of intersection let us assume that there is a detector A in the path of beam A and detector B in the path of beam B.

In the region where the beams intersect there will be parallel diagonal planes of constructive and destructive interference separated by a wavelength.

Now let us block both of the beams A and B before they reach the intersection point.

Next we place a thin absorbing layer, whose thickness is much less than a wavelength, at the position of one of the diagonal planes of destructive interference.

Now we open each of the beams A or B alone and verify that the beam is absorbed by the thin absorbing layer so that neither detector A or B fires.

Now we open both of the beams A and B together.

The two beams now reach both sides of the diagonal absorber in such a way that there is destructive interference of their amplitudes in the plane of the absorber. Thus the probability of the absorber absorbing a photon is zero.

I believe now that the beams will "leap-frog" the absorber so that half the time detector A detects a photon and half the time detector B detects a photon.

How could we interpret such a result?

Let us assume detector A fires. By conservation of momentum we can track back along the path A that the photon must have taken up to the diagonal absorber.

But how did it get through the absorber?

I submit that the only way it got through was that, using David Deutsch's phrase, a "shadow" photon passed along path B at exactly the same time such that it destructively interfered with the path A photon allowing them both to avoid being absorbed.

That shadow photon must have been detected by detector B in a "parallel" world.

That parallel version of the experimenter makes the same argument, tracking back his shadow photon along path B, and thus reasons that another photon traveling along path A must have crossed the absorber at exactly the same time as his photon and must have been detected by detector A in a parallel world.

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I find this experiment to be very interesting and thought-provoking. The idea of parallel worlds and shadow photons is a fascinating concept that has been explored in various theories and interpretations of quantum mechanics. However, before drawing any conclusions from this experiment, it is important to consider potential flaws and limitations.

Firstly, the experiment assumes that the absorber is thin enough to allow for the "leap-frogging" of the photons. This may not always be the case in practical experiments, and the thickness of the absorber could potentially affect the results. Additionally, the experiment relies on the assumption that the two beams are perfectly coherent and that the detectors are able to accurately measure the absorption of the photons. Any slight deviations or imperfections could affect the results.

Furthermore, this experiment does not take into account other factors that could influence the behavior of the photons, such as external forces or interactions with particles in the environment. It is possible that these factors could also play a role in the observed results.

In terms of interpretation, there are various theories and explanations that could be used to explain the results of this experiment. The idea of parallel worlds and shadow photons is just one possibility, and there may be other interpretations that could also fit the data.

Overall, this experiment raises interesting questions and offers potential insights into the behavior of photons. However, further research and experimentation would be needed to fully understand and interpret the results.
 

Related to Simplified Afshar experiment: many-worlds interpretation

1. What is the Simplified Afshar experiment?

The Simplified Afshar experiment is a thought experiment designed to test the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. It involves a setup where a photon is sent through two slits and then detected by a screen. However, before reaching the screen, a lens is placed in front of one of the slits to create an interference pattern. The experiment aims to determine whether the photon behaves as a wave or a particle based on whether it interferes with itself or not.

2. What is the many-worlds interpretation?

The many-worlds interpretation is a theory in quantum mechanics that suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a different universe or parallel reality. This means that instead of a single outcome, all possible outcomes occur simultaneously in different universes. This interpretation was first proposed by physicist Hugh Everett III in the 1950s.

3. How does the Simplified Afshar experiment support the many-worlds interpretation?

The Simplified Afshar experiment supports the many-worlds interpretation by showing that the photon behaves as both a wave and a particle at the same time. This is because the experiment creates an interference pattern, indicating that the photon is behaving as a wave, but also hits the screen at a specific point, indicating that it is behaving as a particle. This can be explained by the many-worlds interpretation, where the photon exists in multiple parallel universes, behaving as a wave in some and a particle in others.

4. Are there any other interpretations of the Simplified Afshar experiment?

Yes, there are other interpretations of the Simplified Afshar experiment, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, which states that the act of observation collapses the wave function and determines a single outcome. There is also the pilot wave theory, which suggests that there is a hidden wave that guides the behavior of particles. However, the many-worlds interpretation is the only one that can fully explain the results of the experiment.

5. What are the implications of the Simplified Afshar experiment and the many-worlds interpretation?

The Simplified Afshar experiment and the many-worlds interpretation have significant implications for our understanding of reality and the nature of the universe. It suggests that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, each with different versions of ourselves and different outcomes of events. This challenges our traditional understanding of cause and effect and raises questions about the true nature of reality.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
52
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
302
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
81
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
327
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top