"SNR in X-ray Imaging: Calculating & Effects

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of SNR for an ideal digital detector exposed to 5 µGy, with a mean pixel value of 100 and a standard deviation of 5. The relationship between pixel value and detector dose is linear. The effect of applying a linear gain of factor 4 on SNR is also discussed, with the conclusion that SNR is unaffected by gain as both noise and signal would increase by the same amount. However, the exact formula for SNR is not certain, as it is defined differently for different purposes.
  • #1
BobP
74
1

Homework Statement


(1) An ideal digital detector only suffers from quantum noise. If, after being exposed to 5 µGy the mean pixel value in the image is 100 and the standard deviation of the pixel values in the image is 5, calculate the SNR?

The relationship between pixel value and detector dose is linear.

(2) What is the effect on SNR of applying a linear gain of factor 4 to increase all pixel values

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As I understand SNR = N/sqrt(N) so I would have said SNR = 10
But I don't understand why they gave the S.D value of 5...

Re part (2) I thought SNR was unaffected by gain as both noise and signal would increase by the same amount

But I am not sure about either answer.
Thanks for the help
 
  • #3
BobP said:

Homework Statement


(1) An ideal digital detector only suffers from quantum noise. If, after being exposed to 5 µGy the mean pixel value in the image is 100 and the standard deviation of the pixel values in the image is 5, calculate the SNR?

The relationship between pixel value and detector dose is linear.

(2) What is the effect on SNR of applying a linear gain of factor 4 to increase all pixel values

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As I understand SNR = N/sqrt(N) so I would have said SNR = 10
But I don't understand why they gave the S.D value of 5...

Re part (2) I thought SNR was unaffected by gain as both noise and signal would increase by the same amount

But I am not sure about either answer.
Thanks for the help
SNR is defined in different ways for different purposes. I can't think of a purpose for which it would take the form N/√N. (Why doesn't that collapse to √N? Are the two Ns different?)
The form μ/σ given at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio#Alternative_definition looks appropriate.
Of course, for a given arrangement, if you just vary the sample size N then you will get something proportional to √N, but not simply equal to it.
 

1. What is SNR in X-ray imaging?

SNR stands for Signal-to-Noise Ratio and it is a measure of the quality of an image in X-ray imaging. It is the ratio of the signal (desired information) to the noise (unwanted interference) in the image. A higher SNR indicates a higher quality image with less noise.

2. How is SNR calculated in X-ray imaging?

SNR is calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity by the standard deviation of the background noise. The mean signal intensity can be obtained by measuring the average pixel value in the image, while the standard deviation of the noise can be measured in a region of the image with no signal present.

3. What factors affect SNR in X-ray imaging?

The main factors that affect SNR in X-ray imaging include the radiation dose, the quality of the X-ray source, the type and thickness of the object being imaged, and the efficiency of the detector. A higher radiation dose and a high-quality X-ray source can increase the SNR, while a thicker or denser object may decrease the SNR.

4. How does SNR impact image quality in X-ray imaging?

A higher SNR results in a higher quality image with better contrast and less noise. This means that important details in the image will be clearer and easier to distinguish. A lower SNR can lead to a grainy or blurry image, making it harder to accurately interpret the image.

5. What are the effects of SNR on radiation dose in X-ray imaging?

A higher SNR allows for a lower radiation dose to be used while still maintaining a high-quality image. This is important for reducing the potential harmful effects of radiation on patients. However, a lower SNR may require a higher radiation dose to achieve a similar image quality, which can increase the risk of radiation exposure.

Similar threads

A COG calculation of diffracted spots on a camera
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
769
Quality of imaging in fluoroscopy
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
780
Stargazing Astro Image Stacking (optimize DSS image stacking and post processing)
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
A Larger X-ray dose in traditional X-ray of head vs. Head CT?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
421
X-ray Tube Output: 80μGy/mAs at 1m, 900µGy/s @1m
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is the potential for extremity doses in this X-ray exposure incident?
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
885
TV antenna amplifier noise calculation
    • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Unusual SNR in the guide of a Spectrum Analyzer
    • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fluoroscopic optimal conditions
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
752
How Small Must a Bone Be to Detect a 5% Change in X-ray Imaging Intensity?
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top