Solving a Lever Problem: Need Help from Experts | Join Our Forum!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Girn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lever
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a lever problem involving a 33m beam with two supports and specific loads applied at different points. The user is struggling to calculate the support reactions due to confusion over the placement of forces and torques. Key points include the need for clarity in presenting the problem, as misinterpretations can lead to errors in calculations. Participants suggest verifying calculations by ensuring total downward forces equal total upward forces and highlight a potential rounding issue with the distributed load. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise problem representation and careful mathematical reasoning in physics problems.
Physics news on Phys.org
Summarizing the problem in text avoids making people squint at photographs.

33m beam has two supports
overhangs both by 5m
600kN at extreme right end
900kN at extreme left end
159kN/m over entire length
Calculate support reactions.
...

You seem to have worked the torques...
Where did you get stuck? Work slowly through the math - showing your reasoning.
 
I don't know where I am getting stuck, but I aint getting the answer. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.. I've tried so many different combinations.. obviously the basis for the formula is clockwise movements=counterclockwise movements, but I aint getting the answer.. and 900kN is not at the extreme left end, its 8m from the left end.
 
Oh I misread that - see the problem with presenting the problem in a photograph?

I'm having trouble treading your working in the photo - I see a 900x8 in there ... that would be the torque about the extreme left end from the 900kN point force. But there is no pivot there: the pivot is 5m, in from that end.

You can reality check your answer by noticing that the total downward force has to equal the total upward force (the beam ain't going anywhere.)

Mind you - taking a look at the answers they give (3297kN and 3453kN) I see they add up to 6750kN upwards... the total downwards force is 6747kN, suggesting that the beam will lift off under a net unbalance 3kN.

I think the distributed force was supposed to be 159.09kN/m ... and somebody rounded off when they shouldn't have.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top