Solving a Relativistic Rocket Collision

In summary, two powerless rockets, Rocket 1 and Rocket 2, are on a collision course with a speed of v = 0.800c and v = -0.600c respectively. They are initially 2.52 * 10^12m apart, as measured by Liz, an Earth observer. Liz also measures the length of both rockets to be 50m. The respective proper lengths of Rocket 1 and Rocket 2 are 83.33m and 62.5m. The length of each rocket as measured by an observer in the other rocket is 27.01m for Rocket 1 and 20.26m for Rocket 2. According to Liz, the time before the rockets collide
  • #1
sour_kremlin
7
0

Homework Statement


Two powerless rockets are on a collision course. The rockets are moving with speed v = 0.800c (rocket 1) and v = -.600c (rocket 2) and are initially 2.52 * 10^12m apart as measured by Liz, an Earth observer. Both rockets are 50m long as measured by Liz.

a) What are their respective proper lengths?

b) What is the length of each rocket as measured by an observer in the other rocket?

c) According to Liz, how long before the rockets collide?

d) According to rocket 1, how long before they collide?

e) According to rocket 2, how long before they collide?

f) If both rocket crews are capable of total evacuation within 90 minutes will there be any casualties?

Homework Equations



[itex] t = \gamma t_0 [/itex]
[itex] L \gamma = L_0 [/itex]
[itex] \Delta x' = \gamma ( \Delta x - v \Delta t ) [/itex]
[itex] \Delta t' = \gamma ( \Delta t - v \Delta x ) [/itex]
[itex] u'_x = \frac{ u_x - v }{1 - u_x v } [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I think parts a) through c) are correct.

a) Rocket 1's proper length is given by [itex] L \gamma = \frac{50m}{\sqrt{1 - .8^2}} = 83.33m [/itex]

Similarly for Rocket 2, [itex] L_0 = \frac{50m}{\sqrt{1 - .6^2}} = 62.5m [/itex].

b) Approach: find the speed of rocket 2 relative to rocket 1, then use length contraction.

Let S be the reference frame of rocket 1, S' be the reference frame of the Earth, and the subscript 2 represent rocket 2. Then the velocity of rocket 2 wrt rocket 1 is [itex] \frac{v_{S'2} + v_{S'S}}{1 + v_{S'2} v_{S'S}} = -.946c [/itex]

The length of rocket 1 measured by rocket 2 would then be [itex] \frac{L_0}{\gamma} = 83.33m \sqrt{1 - .946^2} = 27.01m[/itex]

The length of rocket 2 measured by rocket 1 would be [itex] 62.5m \sqrt{1 - .946^2} = 20.26m [/itex].

c) I get [itex]t = 6020s = 100.3 min[/itex].

d) This is where things get messed up. The time interval that Liz measures is not proper because the defining events: the initial position of the rocket 1 and the collision do not occur at the same point in space. The initial position and the collision in rocket 1's reference frame is at the same point in space in rocket 1's frame, so that time is proper.

And the link between proper time and some other time should be given by the time dilation formula. The time before the collision in rocket 1's frame is then [itex]t_0 = 6020s \sqrt{1 - .8^2} = 3612s = 60.2 minutes[/itex].

I've been told that this is wrong though, and that the method for getting the correct answer involves using length contraction on the distance that Liz measures and the velocity of rocket 2 wrt rocket 1 found in part b). This makes sense to me. What doesn't make sense is why my other approach doesn't work. To do this, I assume that Liz measures the distance between the rockets simulatenously (the length she measures is proper). When I do it this way, I get rocket 1 has 84 minutes and rocket 2 has 112 minutes. Completely different than what I was get using my other line of reasoning!

After my initial approach failed, I tried to use the Lorentz transforms to solve this and ran into even more problems. Let [itex] \Delta t' = \gamma ( \Delta t - v \Delta x )[/itex] where S' is rocket 1's frame and S is Liz's frame. Liz measures a different position and time for each event: in her frame the rocket moves from [itex](x_1, t_1)[/itex] to [itex](x_2, t_2)[/itex]. In rocket 1's frame, though, the two events happen at the same point in space. It moves from [itex] (x'_1, t'_1) [/itex] to [itex] (x'_1, t'_2) [/itex]. So [itex] \Delta x' = 0 [/itex], while [itex] \Delta x [/itex], [itex] \Delta t [/itex], and [itex] \Delta t' \neq 0 [/itex].

If I use the Lorentz transform for [itex] \Delta t' = \gamma ( \Delta t - v \Delta x ) [/itex], then my earlier application of time dilation seems incorrect. The Lorentz transform doesn't reduce to the time dilation equation. I tried to plug in numbers here: the time Liz measures before the collision occurs is [itex] \Delta t = 6020s [/itex], the distance rocket 1 travels in Liz's frame before the collision occurs is [itex] \Delta x = 1.44 * 10^{12} m [/itex], and the speed connecting the frames is .800c. This calculation gives me [itex] \Delta t' = 6019s [/itex], which is way too close to the time Liz measures to make sense.

But, if I use the Lorentz transform for [itex] \Delta t = \gamma ( \Delta t' - v \Delta x' )[/itex], then the [itex] \Delta x' [/itex] goes away and I get time dilation. But how can this be? I seem to be getting completely different relationships between Liz's time and rocket 1's time. So my attempt to use the Lorentz transform just left me more confused. I'm obviously doing something gravely wrong.

Sorry for the long post. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try and work with 'velocity transformations' instead of position transformations. The collision takes place at the same SPACTIME event - not different events - regardless of which frame you choose.
If rocket A has velocity Va (w.r.t EARTH frame) and B has Vb (also w.r.t EARTH) , then in A's frame, B is approaching with a velocity given by a transformation from the Earth frame- (Vb - Va) / (1 - Va Vb / c^2) = -1.4 c / (1 + 0.48) = - 0.95 c.
Now that you have the velocity in each rocket's frame, to get the TIME to collision - do a time transformation from the Earth's frame collision time. According to the earth, the collision time is simply the distance / relative velocity = 1.0 sec
In rocket A's frame, the time will move slower (time dilation) - the time between collisions is Tearth / Gamma = 1 / sqrt (1 - (.8 ^ 2)) = 0.6 sec
Rocket B's frame , 1 / sqrt (1 - (0.6^2)) = 0.8 s
 
  • #3
I think sour_kremlin has probably graduated by now...:wink:
 
  • Like
Likes TSny

Related to Solving a Relativistic Rocket Collision

1. What is a relativistic rocket collision?

A relativistic rocket collision is a scenario in which two rockets traveling at extremely high speeds (close to the speed of light) collide with each other. This concept is derived from Einstein's theory of relativity, which explains that the laws of physics remain the same for all observers regardless of their relative motion.

2. How does the speed of the rockets affect the collision?

The speed of the rockets is a crucial factor in a relativistic rocket collision. At such high speeds, the mass of the rockets increases due to relativistic effects, meaning that they have more energy and momentum. This results in a more powerful and destructive collision compared to non-relativistic collisions.

3. What are some potential consequences of a relativistic rocket collision?

A relativistic rocket collision can have catastrophic consequences, such as the destruction of both rockets and the objects inside them. It can also create a shockwave and release high levels of radiation, leading to damage to surrounding objects and potential harm to living beings.

4. Is it possible to prevent a relativistic rocket collision?

Preventing a relativistic rocket collision is challenging and requires precise calculations and coordination between the two rockets. One approach is to adjust the speed of the rockets to avoid a collision, but this may not always be feasible. Another option is to use advanced technology, such as electromagnetic fields, to redirect the path of the rockets.

5. How can studying relativistic rocket collisions benefit us?

Studying relativistic rocket collisions can provide valuable insights into the behavior of matter and energy at extreme speeds. It can also help us develop better strategies for preventing and mitigating the consequences of such collisions. Additionally, understanding relativistic collisions is crucial for the advancement of space travel and exploration.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
254
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
273
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
910
Back
Top