I Solving a Tricky Nonlinear Equation System: A Quest for Closed Form Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a closed-form solution for the nonlinear equation system defined by x² - y² = 5 and x + y = xy, which leads to a quartic equation: x^4 - 2x^3 + 5x^2 - 10x + 5 = 0. Participants note that there are no integer or rational solutions, and the quartic has two real roots and a pair of complex-conjugate roots. One contributor suggests using Wolfram Alpha for easier root calculations, while another points out potential algebraic errors in the formulation of the quartic. The general consensus is that solving quartic equations can be complex and often results in non-intuitive roots.
n7imo
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to find a closed form (an algebraic solution) for the following system:

x² - y² = 5
x + y = xy

It's a bit tricky but I manage to end up with the quartic equation:
x^4 - 2x^3 + 5x^2 -10x + 5 =0
And this is where I get stuck looking for a closed form root.
Any suggestion would be appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
trial and error of synthetic division.
 
n7imo said:
I'm trying to find a closed form (an algebraic solution) for the following system:

x² - y² = 5
x + y = xy

It's a bit tricky but I manage to end up with the quartic equation:
x^4 - 2x^3 + 5x^2 -10x + 5 =0
And this is where I get stuck looking for a closed form root.
Any suggestion would be appreciated
You won't find any integer or rational solutions. The general solution to a fourth degree equation is pretty daunting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function

This particular equation has two real and a pair of complex-conjugate roots.

BTW, I checked your algebra in reducing your system of equations to one equation in x. I think you have some mistakes there, since I don't obtain your particular quartic equation.

In any event, the resulting quartic still has two real and a pair of complex-conjugate solutions, none of which are nice integers or rationals.

I used Wolfram Alpha to solve for the roots. It's much easier than anything else.
 
  • Like
Likes n7imo
SteamKing said:
You won't find any integer or rational solutions. The general solution to a fourth degree equation is pretty daunting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function

This particular equation has two real and a pair of complex-conjugate roots.

BTW, I checked your algebra in reducing your system of equations to one equation in x. I think you have some mistakes there, since I don't obtain your particular quartic equation.

In any event, the resulting quartic still has two real and a pair of complex-conjugate solutions, none of which are nice integers or rationals.

I used Wolfram Alpha to solve for the roots. It's much easier than anything else.

Indeed, the right resulting quartic equation is x^4 - 2x^3 - 5x^2 -10x - 5 =0. I used Cardano and Lagrange method to find the real roots, but their form is very ugly.
Actually I got this equation while trying to solve a simple geometrical problem. I'll post it today on a new thread, I'm interested in finding a simpler method to solving it since mine leads to a quartic equation.

Thanks for the contribution.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top