Solving for Speed & Revolution: F * delta t = p

In summary, the conversation is discussing the calculation of the speed and angular velocity of a rod after an initial force is applied. The participants discuss using equations such as F * delta t = p and F * delta t /m = v to determine the speed of the rod's center of mass. They also consider using angular momentum and the moment of inertia to calculate the angular velocity. The conversation ends with a discussion of determining the height and time of flight of the rod.
  • #1
Justforthisquestion1
30
2
Homework Statement
I am looking for the distance x from the center of mass of a rod with I(cm) = 1/12 * m * l^2 were i can apply a Force F over a time delta t so that the rod does excactly one revolution before he is back at its original height.
Relevant Equations
Torque, Rotational Energy, Kinetic Energy, angular momentum
Honestly i have very little idea.
F * delta t = p
F * delta t /m = v
So i know the speed of the rod
And i know that however high the rod is supposed to go, when its back down it should have done excactly one revolution.
I have the feeling that I should
So probably i have to use something like
1/2 *a * T^2 = h
and
omega * T = pi?
Picture.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Justforthisquestion1 said:
F * delta t = p
F * delta t /m = v
So i know the speed of the rod
[...]
So probably i have to use something like
1/2 *a * T^2 = h
You certainly have enough information that you can know the speed of the rod after the initial force has been applied. With the initial upward velocity in hand, you will be in a position to work on determining the time of flight.

Can you show us the value you arrive at for ##v##?

Will the force of gravity during the initial acceleration affect this in any way?

Note that I approve of an approach where you decide on strategy first -- deciding what you can solve for and what that will then allow you to solve for next. With such a strategy in hand, you can proceed to the grunt work of solving the equations.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #3
jbriggs444 said:
You certainly have enough information that you can know the speed of the rod after the initial force has been applied.
Did you mean the speed of the rod's center of mass?

To @Justforthisquestion1 : You also have enough information to find the angular speed of the rod as a function of ##x## in terms of F(Δt).
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and jbriggs444
  • #4
Thank you for both your answers!
I think what a dont understand is, is whether the point of force application has to be included when calculating v or omega. Also the body will translate and rotate which confuses me even more.
So lets say:
F*delta t = m * v
--> v = F * delta t / m
and since i apply F at distance x from cm it should be
omega = F *delta t / (m * x)
Is that correct so far? The force has to cause translation as well as rotation?

Edit no wait i have to use angular momentum dont i?
r * p = I * omega
with p = F * delta t
an I = 1/12 * m * l^2
we get:
omega = 12 * x * F * delta t / (m * l^2)
and then i would get the speed of cm by multiplying omega with l? Or do i use F * delta t = m * v
for v of cm? And why?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Justforthisquestion1 said:
since i apply F at distance x from cm it should be
omega = F *delta t / (m * x)
No, you have to consider the moment of inertia of the rod.
What angular momentum will the force impart to the rod?
 
  • Like
Likes Justforthisquestion1
  • #6
haruspex said:
No, you have to consider the moment of inertia of the rod.
What angular momentum will the force impart to the rod?
Thats kind of a tricky question.
i am using the cm as axis of rotation?
x * p = angular momentum?
-->
x * p = l * omega
with p = F * delta t
an I = 1/12 * m * l^2
we get:
omega = 12 * x * F * delta t / (m * l^2)
and then i would get the speed of cm by multiplying omega with l? Or do i use F * delta t = m * v
for v of cm? And why?
 
  • #7
No!
I had it all wrong. So angular momentum and linear momentum are conserved seperately.
So for v and the conservation of linear momentum i can say
p = m * v
--> F * delta t / m = v
But for omega and the conservation of angular momentum i can say
p * x = I * omega
omega = p * x / I

Edit: Okay so now i am stuck again. I now now v and omega.
And as i said before i have a time T in which the stich rises up and falls down again, and does exactly one revolution.
So omega * T = 2 * pi
and 0.5 * m * v^2 = m * g * h
But how to go on?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
jbriggs444 said:
You certainly have enough information that you can know the speed of the rod after the initial force has been applied. With the initial upward velocity in hand, you will be in a position to work on determining the time of flight.

Can you show us the value you arrive at for ##v##?

Will the force of gravity during the initial acceleration affect this in any way?

Note that I approve of an approach where you decide on strategy first -- deciding what you can solve for and what that will then allow you to solve for next. With such a strategy in hand, you can proceed to the grunt work of solving the equations.
Gravity is to be neglected during the initial acceleration
For the rest please kindly look to my entry before this one
 
  • #9
Justforthisquestion1 said:
omega = 12 * x * F * delta t / (m * l^2)
good
Justforthisquestion1 said:
and then i would get the speed of cm by multiplying omega with l?
No. ω is the rate of rotation about the cm.
You already have the speed of the cm:
Justforthisquestion1 said:
F*delta t = m * v
 
  • Like
Likes Justforthisquestion1
  • #10
haruspex said:
good

No. ω is the rate of rotation about the cm.
You already have the speed of the cm:
Yes because angular momentum and linear momentum are conserved seperately.
Now:
i have a time T in which the rod rises up and falls down again, and does exactly one revolution.
So omega * T = 2 * pi
and 0.5 * m * v^2 = m * g * h
and also v * t - 0.5 * g *T^2 = 2* h
This is because it needs to go up and down so 2 * h
Oh i just realized i can combine these 3! I will be back in a bit when i have calculated it
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Does gravity produce torque around the cm? It should not?
 
  • #12
Justforthisquestion1 said:
Does gravity produce torque around the cm? It should not?
Right, it does not. In fact, that's almost the definition of cm.
 
  • Like
Likes Justforthisquestion1
  • #13
@Justforthisquestion1

Please see the Latex Math formatting guide. It will help you convey you work, and help others interpret it. It's not laborious to learn the basics.
 
  • Like
Likes Justforthisquestion1
  • #14
erobz said:
@Justforthisquestion1

Please see the Latex Math formatting guide. It will help you convey you work, and help others interpret it. It's not laborious to learn the basics.
Will do
 

1. What is the formula for solving for speed and revolution?

The formula for solving for speed and revolution is F * delta t = p. This equation represents the relationship between force, time, and momentum.

2. How is this formula used in scientific research?

This formula is used in various scientific fields, such as physics and engineering, to calculate the speed and revolution of objects. It can also be used to study the effects of force on an object's momentum over a period of time.

3. What do the variables F, delta t, and p represent in this formula?

F represents force, which is a measure of the strength of a push or pull on an object. Delta t represents the change in time, or the duration of the force being applied. P represents momentum, which is the product of an object's mass and velocity.

4. How can this formula be applied in real-world scenarios?

This formula can be applied in various real-world scenarios, such as calculating the speed and revolution of a car's engine, determining the force needed to launch a rocket into space, or analyzing the impact of a collision between two objects.

5. Are there any limitations to this formula?

While this formula is useful in many situations, it does have some limitations. It assumes that the force applied is constant over the entire duration of time, and it does not take into account external factors such as friction or air resistance. Additionally, it is based on classical mechanics and may not accurately describe the behavior of objects at very high speeds or in quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
379
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
922
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
736
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
570
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
698
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
844
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top