MHB Solving for time in a hyperbolic trajectory

AI Thread Summary
The spacecraft is on a hyperbolic orbit with a semi-major axis of -35,000 km and an eccentricity of 1.2, transitioning from a true anomaly of 20° to 103°. The calculated elapsed time interval, Δt, between these two positions is approximately 4.15 days, which is significantly longer than the expected one hour. The solution involves determining the eccentric anomalies and using them to compute the mean anomalies, followed by the time calculations based on the specific hyperbolic equations. An alternative method suggested is to apply Kepler's third law, though it may not be applicable to all hyperbolic trajectories. The current solution is deemed correct despite the initial expectation of a shorter time interval.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
A spacecraft is on a hyperbolic orbit relative to the Earth with $a = -35000$ km and an eccentricity of $e = 1.2$.
At some initial time $t_0$, the spacecraft is at a true anomaly of $\nu_0 = 20^{\circ}$.
At some later time $t$, the true anomaly is $\nu = 103^{\circ}$.
What is the elapsed time interval $\Delta t$ between these two positions?

This solution is wrong. The answer should be around an hour. How else can I do this?

Since we are dealing with hyperbolic trajectories, our equations for the eccentric hyperbolic anomaly are
\begin{alignat*}{3}
M_{\text{h}} & = & \frac{\mu_{earth}}{h^3}(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}t\\
M_{\text{h}} & = & e\sinh(F) - F
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, we need the eccentric anomalies $F$ and $F_0$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
F & = & 2\tanh^{-1}\left[\sqrt{\frac{e - 1}{e + 1}}\cdot\tan\left(\frac{\nu}{2}\right)\right]\\
& = & 41.51866^{\circ}\\
F_0 & = & 2\tanh^{-1}\left[\sqrt{\frac{e - 1}{e + 1}}\cdot\tan\left(\frac{\nu_0}{2}\right)\right]\\
& = & 6.08648^{\circ}
\end{alignat*}
Since we don't know $h$ explicitly, we can solve for $h$,
$$
h = \sqrt{a\cdot\mu_{earth}\cdot(1 - e^2)}.
$$
Next, we need to find the eccentric anomaly for $F_0$ and $F$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
M_{F_0} & = & e\sinh(F_0) - F_0\\
& = & -5.95877^{\circ}\\
M_{F} & = & e\sinh(F_0) - F_0\\
& = & -40.5709^{\circ}\\
\end{alignat*}
Finally, we can solve for the time and take the difference to obtain $\Delta t$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
t & = & M_F\cdot\frac{h^3}{\mu_{earth}\cdot(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}}\\
& = & -420773\text{ s}\\
t_0 & = & M_{F_0}\cdot\frac{h^3}{\mu_{earth}\cdot(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}}\\
& = & -61800.2\text{ s}
\end{alignat*}
Since time isn't negative, we simply take the absolute value of the $t$ and $t_0$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\Delta t & = & t - t_0\\
& = & 358973\text{ s}\\
& = & 4.15478\text{ days}
\end{alignat*}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org

This solution is correct and provides the elapsed time interval between the two positions in the spacecraft's hyperbolic trajectory. If you are looking for a simpler or alternative method, you can also use Kepler's third law which states that the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis. Using this, you can solve for the orbital period and then find the elapsed time interval between the two positions. However, this method may not work for all hyperbolic trajectories as they do not follow the same pattern as elliptical orbits.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top