Solving n_{n0} Using Charge Neutrality & Mass Action Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter mzh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Law Mass
mzh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Dear PF users
Would be great if somebody could point me out how to arrive at n_{n0} = \frac{1}{2} \left[ (N_D - N_A) + \sqrt{ (N_D - N_A)^2 + 4n_i^2} \right] (n-type charge carrier concentration at thermal equilibrium) by using the expression for the charge neutrality n+N_A = p+N_D and the mass action law np=n_i^2.

I understand I should assume that N_D > N_A, but I can't work it out.

Any comments are very welcomed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mzh said:
Dear PF users
Would be great if somebody could point me out how to arrive at n_{n0} = \frac{1}{2} \left[ (N_D - N_A) + \sqrt{ (N_D - N_A)^2 + 4n_i^2} \right] (n-type charge carrier concentration at thermal equilibrium) by using the expression for the charge neutrality n+N_A = p+N_D and the mass action law np=n_i^2.

I think I found the solution to this. The important point to note is that we assume relatively high temperatures. Given the relationship for N_D^+ = \frac{N_D}{1+2\exp\left[\frac{E_F - E_D}{kT}\right]}, we can assume that E_F - E_D is much lower than zero. Then, when dividing by kT = 0.025 \mbox{eV} at room temperature, the exponential term becomes approximately zero and so N_D^+ = N_D. Then, N_D can be inserted into the charge neutrality condition and, after expressing p=\frac{n_i^2}{n}, the resulting quadratic equation can be solved for n. Great.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
152
Views
9K
Back
Top