Newton's third law is the problem here.leafy said:
leafy said:
Forbidden Topics said:
Space propulsion without mass ejecting, also known as propellantless propulsion, works by using an external energy source to create a force that propels a spacecraft forward. This is often achieved through the use of electromagnetic fields or radiation pressure.
One of the main advantages of space propulsion without mass ejecting is that it eliminates the need for carrying heavy propellant, which reduces the overall weight and cost of the spacecraft. It also allows for longer missions, as there is no need to refuel.
One limitation of space propulsion without mass ejecting is that it currently requires a large amount of energy to generate the necessary force for propulsion. This can be a challenge for long-distance missions. Additionally, the technology is still in its early stages and requires further research and development.
While there have been some proposed concepts for using space propulsion without mass ejecting for interstellar travel, it is currently not feasible with our current technology. The energy requirements and distance involved make it a significant challenge.
Space propulsion without mass ejecting is a relatively new concept and is still being researched and developed. While it has the potential to be more efficient and cost-effective, traditional rocket propulsion is currently the most commonly used method for space travel and has a longer track record of success.