Space-time quantization and its philosophical aspect

In summary: QM.In summary, Modern physics describes matter by real numbers. This means that an absolutely accurate description of any particle requires an infinite amount of information. Intuitively, it seems that this should not be so, and the model of the Conway's Game of Life looks more close to reality. In this game, the state of the system is described by discrete values, i.e. a finite amount of information is sufficient to describe the system. The question arises, are there any analogs of the Game of Life (cellular automata), in which the laws of conservation and the laws of thermodynamics work? The Game of Life clearly reproduces reality very poorly, since it does not contain
  • #1
Spathi
73
7
Modern physics describes matter by real numbers. This means that an absolutely accurate description of any particle requires an infinite amount of information.

Intuitively, it seems that this should not be so, and the model of the Conway's Game of Life looks more close to reality. In this game, the state of the system is described by discrete values, i.e. a finite amount of information is sufficient to describe the system. The question arises, are there any analogs of the Game of Life (cellular automata), in which the laws of conservation and the laws of thermodynamics work?

The Game of Life clearly reproduces reality very poorly, since it does not contain any of this. In addition, this game has a different arrow of time. In our reality, we experrience a psychological arrow of time: we remember the events of the past and predict the events of the future, and this knowledge about the past and the future is very asymmetric - information about the past is much more voluminous, more specific, detailed, more reliable than the information about the future.

In the game Life, if there were intelligent beings, it would be the opposite: according to the state of the system at the moment of the present, it is possible to accurately predict the state of the system in the future, but it is impossible to recreate the state of the system in the past.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Spathi said:
Modern physics describes matter by real numbers. This means that an absolutely accurate description of any particle requires an infinite amount of information. Intuitively, it seems that this should not be so, and the model of the Conway's Game of Life looks more close to reality. In this game, the state of the system is described by discrete values, i.e. a finite amount of information is sufficient to describe the system. The question arises, are there any analogs of the Game of Life (cellular automata), in which the laws of conservation and the laws of thermodynamics work? The Game of Life clearly reproduces reality very poorly, since it does not contain any of this. In addition, this game has a different arrow of time. In our reality, we experrience a psychological arrow of time: we remember the events of the past and predict the events of the future, and this knowledge about the past and the future is very asymmetric - information about the past is much more voluminous, more specific, detailed, more reliable than the information about the future. In the game Life, if there were intelligent beings, it would be the opposite: according to the state of the system at the moment of the present, it is possible to accurately predict the state of the system in the future, but it is impossible to recreate the state of the system in the past.
A lot to unpick there. First statement is wrong though QM uses imaginary numbers all the time.
@PeroK @vanhees71
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, bhobba and topsquark
  • #3
Thread closed for Moderation. (any thread with "philosophical" in the title is an issue...)
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Wrichik Basu, bhobba, vanhees71 and 1 other person

1. What is space-time quantization?

Space-time quantization is a theory that suggests that space and time are not continuous, but rather made up of tiny, discrete units. This means that space and time are not infinitely divisible, but rather have a smallest possible unit of measurement.

2. How does space-time quantization relate to the concept of the universe?

Space-time quantization has significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It suggests that the universe is not continuous and infinite, but rather made up of discrete units. This challenges traditional ideas about the nature of the universe and raises questions about the beginning and end of the universe.

3. What is the philosophical aspect of space-time quantization?

The philosophical aspect of space-time quantization lies in its implications for our understanding of reality. It raises questions about the fundamental nature of space and time, and whether they are truly fundamental or simply emergent properties. It also challenges our perception of the world and the way we experience it.

4. How is space-time quantization being studied and tested?

Currently, space-time quantization is primarily being studied through theoretical models and mathematical calculations. Some scientists are also exploring the possibility of testing this theory through experiments with high-energy particles. However, due to the extremely small scale of space-time units, direct observation or measurement is currently not possible.

5. What are the potential implications of space-time quantization for our understanding of physics?

If space-time quantization is proven to be true, it could have significant implications for our understanding of physics. It could potentially lead to a unified theory that explains the fundamental forces of the universe and bridges the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity. It could also revolutionize our understanding of gravity and the fabric of space-time.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
861
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
634
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Back
Top