Specific Heat Capacity of water

AI Thread Summary
The specific heat capacity of water is approximately 4.18 J/gK, but the presence of sediments and particulates like iron oxide may alter this value. While iron oxide has a lower heat capacity than water, the overall specific heat of a mixture could be less than that of pure water due to the reduced mass of water available for heat transfer. The efficiency of heat transfer in dirty water could be compromised, potentially leading to a higher energy requirement to achieve the same temperature change. However, the thermal conductivity of the mixture may ensure uniform temperature distribution, not affecting the energy needed to raise the temperature. Ultimately, the specific heat capacity of the mixture would likely be lower than that of pure water.
Ajaxx757
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The specific heat capacity of water is accepted to be roughly 4.18 J/gK. How would the specific heat value of a given water sample be effected when sediments and other forms of particulation, such as iron oxide from rust, are present? Would the mixture have a higher specific heat capacity value compared to pure water and thus require more energy to satisfy the same delta T?

Thoughts and any insight will be much appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, what would you think would happen?
 
The heat capacity of iron oxide is much lower than water. So, the heat capacity of the mixtures of water and iron oxide would be less than water alone.

chet
 
  • Like
Likes Ravi Singh choudhary
SteamKing said:
Well, what would you think would happen?

I would expect the dirty water to be a less efficient heat transfer medium and therefore have a higher specific heat. But, let's say I had 10g of pure water as sample A and 10g of dirty water (a mixture of sediments and iron oxides) as sample B, of that 10g the particulates account for .5g of the total weight. Sample A would have a SH of roughly 4.18 while sample B would have a SH value of 4.18 for 9.5g of the mixture and a value "c" for the .5g of particulates with c being less than the value of water. When I look at the situation this way I believe the dirty water would have a lower SH. However, I also wonder on a molecular level if the particulates which are in suspension, play a role in how heat is transferred through conduction. Meaning do they, the particulates, interfere with how well heat is transferred to the surrounding water.
 
Chestermiller said:
The heat capacity of iron oxide is much lower than water. So, the heat capacity of the mixtures of water and iron oxide would be less than water alone.

chet
Chet, see my second post above. Do you believe my thought process is correct? I guess I'm asking, is you're statement based of a similar thought process of mine? And what would you have to say about my last portion with the particulates being in suspension and perhaps effecting how well heat is transferred to the mixture through conduction?
 
The specific heat capacity of water will probably have been measured using a rig that stirs the water to eliminate any error due to conduction. In any case good thermal conductivity just helps ensure uniform temperature. It doesn't/wouldn't change the energy required to raise the temperature.
 
Thread 'Thermo Hydrodynamic Effect'
Vídeo: The footage was filmed in real time. The rotor takes advantage of the thermal agitation of the water. The agitation is uniform, so the resultant is zero. When the aluminum cylinders containing frozen water are immersed in the water, about 30% of their surface is in contact with the water, and the rest is thermally insulated by styrofoam. This creates an imbalance in the agitation: the cold side of the water "shrinks," so that the hot side pushes the cylinders toward the cold...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
310
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
17K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top