Square-Integrable Functions in Curved Spacetime

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of normalized square-integrable functions in non-relativistic quantum mechanics and whether there is an analogous concept for curved spacetime. It also touches on the complication of defining an integral over all space in curved spacetime and the concept of Lorentz invariance in relativistic quantum mechanics. The conversation also references further reading on the topic of volume integration in general relativity.
  • #1
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
8,938
2,945
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, an important set of functions are the normalized square-integrable ones. Those are functions on [itex]\mathcal{R}^3[/itex] such that

[itex]\int |\Psi(x,y,z)|^2 dx dy dz = 1[/itex]

I'm just curious as to whether there is some analogous concept for curved spacetime. One complication in curved spacetime is that an integral over "all space" requires a choice of a way to divide spacetime into spatial slices. Is the above condition on [itex]\Psi[/itex] independent of how one slices up spacetime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I also think you can use the invariant volume element in curved spacetimes. Since it's invariant it must have some certain form, which is generally
[itex] dV= \sqrt{-g} d^{D}x [/itex]
with [itex]g=detg[/itex]
I think it comes out of the Jacobian
 
  • #3
What you have written down isn't even a Lorentz scalar in Minkowski space-time. Different time-like congruences of inertial observers determine different foliations of space-time into space-like hypersurfaces; two different foliations (amounting to two different families of inertial observers) will be related through Lorentz boosts. Geometrically, the foliations correspond to planes of simultaneity relative to a given family of inertial observers and Lorentz boosts will tilt the planes of simultaneity by angles related to the rapidity when going from one family of inertial observers to another.

Quantities that are invariant under such Lorentz boosts are of course Lorentz scalars. For example if we have a charged fluid with charge 4-current density ##j^{\mu}## then ##\partial^{\mu}j_{\mu} = 0## implies that ##Q = \int_{\Sigma} \rho d^{3}x## is a Lorentz invariant (here ##\Sigma## is a single plane of simultaneity relative to a given family of inertial observers).

In relativistic QM, the Lorentz invariant total probability* is given by ##\int \rho d^{3}x = \int i[(\partial_{0}\varphi)\varphi^{\dagger} - (\partial_{0}\varphi^{\dagger})\varphi]d^{3}x = 1##. This value of unity for the total probability is preserved in the same manner the total charge ##Q## is due to the conservation of the probability 4-current density ##j^{\mu} = i[(\partial^{\mu}\varphi )\varphi^{\dagger} - (\partial^{\mu}\varphi^{\dagger} )\varphi]##.

As you noted, what you have written down for the total probability is only valid in non-relativistic QM which uses Galilean relativity as a meta-theory of space-time, not special relativity. As such you can't even use that if you want a Lorentz invariant total probability let alone one that is valid for all space-time foliations, not just those determined by families of inertial observers in Minkowski space-time.

*of course once we go to QFT, the concepts of probability 4-current density and total probability are replaced, for obvious reasons, by those of charge 4-current density (operators) and total charge (operators) as per ##j^{\mu} \rightarrow qj^{\mu}##.
 
  • #5


Thank you for your question. The concept of square-integrable functions in curved spacetime is indeed an important one in the study of quantum mechanics in general relativity. In curved spacetime, the metric is no longer constant and may vary from point to point, leading to a non-Euclidean geometry. This means that the definition of "volume" and "distance" may also vary, making the concept of a simple integral over all space more complicated.

To address this, one approach is to use the concept of a measure, which is a way of assigning a numerical value to a set of points in a space. In the case of curved spacetime, a measure can be defined using the metric tensor, which takes into account the varying geometry of spacetime.

Using this measure, we can then define a square-integrable function as one whose squared magnitude can be integrated over a region of curved spacetime, such that the integral converges to a finite value. This condition is independent of how one divides up the spacetime into spatial slices, as the measure takes into account the varying geometry.

In summary, the concept of square-integrable functions in curved spacetime does exist and is crucial in the study of quantum mechanics in general relativity. It is defined using a measure that takes into account the varying geometry of spacetime, making it independent of the choice of spatial slices.
 

Related to Square-Integrable Functions in Curved Spacetime

1. What are square-integrable functions in curved spacetime?

Square-integrable functions in curved spacetime are functions that satisfy certain mathematical conditions in order to be well-behaved and measurable in a curved spacetime. Specifically, they must have a finite integral when squared over the entire curved spacetime. This ensures that the function remains bounded and does not have any unphysical behaviors.

2. How are square-integrable functions different from other functions in curved spacetime?

Square-integrable functions have the additional requirement of being integrable over the entire curved spacetime, while other functions may not have this restriction. This means that square-integrable functions are more rigorously defined and have a higher level of mathematical precision in their description of physical phenomena in curved spacetime.

3. Why are square-integrable functions important in the study of curved spacetime?

Square-integrable functions are important because they are used to describe physical quantities and phenomena in curved spacetime, such as energy, momentum, and curvature. They also play a crucial role in the mathematical framework of general relativity, which describes the relationship between matter and spacetime.

4. Can square-integrable functions be used to model real-world scenarios?

Yes, square-integrable functions can be used to model real-world scenarios in curved spacetime. They are commonly used in theoretical physics and astrophysics to describe the behavior of matter and energy in the presence of gravity, as well as in practical applications such as gravitational wave detection and black hole simulations.

5. What are some examples of square-integrable functions in curved spacetime?

Examples of square-integrable functions in curved spacetime include the energy density of a gravitational field, the electric and magnetic fields in an electromagnetic wave, and the wave function of a particle in a curved spacetime. These functions are essential for accurately describing physical phenomena in curved spacetime and are used extensively in scientific research and calculations.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
661
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
187
Replies
11
Views
276
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top