Statistical interpretation (intro to quantum)

In summary, the conversation discussed the concept of finding the average of a set of data and how it may not correspond to an actual physical value. It also touched on the concept of expectation value and how it relates to measuring a particle's position. The probability of finding a particle at a specific position was explained using the generalized statistical interpretation.
  • #1
Colen
2
0
When we calculate the average of anything: we add up (or integrate) the sum{ [all the things were taking the average of] * [the probability of getting that thing ]}.

The thing about the average I'm that curious about is for example: the average height of 5 people turns out to be say 6 feet. suppose here it turns out that NONE of the people have a height of exactly 6 feet.

So the "average" (expectation value) doesn't correspond to an actual physical value that anyone person has.

So why is it that when we find the expectation value (of say position) on a particle it corresponds to a physical value that we can measure; when this value doesn't (necessarily) correspond to anyone actual value that the particle has?

I think the root of my problem is; how is it that the square of our wave function corresponds to the probability of finding that particle (at a given time and place) ?

Perhaps I'm confusing a single measurement on a particle compared to multiple measurements on a particle in multiple equally prepared states??

Anyways any clarification would be appreciated, Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The term 'expectation value' is an unfortunate one and really should be something more like 'ensemble average'. Imagine you know all of the accessible quantum states of a given system, and there are g of them. And you were to construct an ensemble of g systems one in each of the accessible states. If you were to measure the value of some quantity X for each of the systems and then add up the values and divide by g, this would be the ensemble average or 'expectation value' and there is no reason to expect that the number should be one that is possible to actually measure.

In regards to your question about why the square of a position wave function gives a probability distribution of position, well it is a result of the generalized statistical interpretation. Here is how quantum theory works:

Given an operator, if one can find all of its eigenvectors and eigenvalues, then one can express the state of a system as a linear combination (or integral if the spectrum of eigenvalues is continuous) of the eigenvectors of the operator. If fn is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue n, and the eigenvalue is non degenerate, then the probability to measure the value n is given by the square of the constant on fn in the linear combination. For example, if the operator is the position in one dimension: x, then the eigenfunctions are delta functions, because:

[tex] x \delta(x-y) = y \delta(x-y) [/tex]

and the eigenvalues are any real number y, so that the spectrum is continuous. Now we can write the wave function as an integral over eigenfunctions:

[tex] \Psi(x)=\int c(y) \delta(x-y) dy [/tex]

and as usual the coefficients c(y) can be found by fouriers trick (exploiting the "dirac" orthonormality of the eigenfunctions):

[tex] c(y) = \int \Psi(x) \delta(x-y) dx = \Psi(y) [/tex]

now by the statistical interpretation the probability that we measure a position between y and y+dy is:

[tex] P(y+dy) = | c(y) |^2 dy = |\Psi(y)|^2 dy [/tex]

which is the well known result. Hope that helps
 

Related to Statistical interpretation (intro to quantum)

1. What is statistical interpretation in quantum mechanics?

Statistical interpretation in quantum mechanics is a way of understanding the probabilistic nature of quantum systems. It suggests that the behavior and properties of subatomic particles can only be described in terms of probabilities, rather than definite outcomes.

2. How does statistical interpretation differ from other interpretations of quantum mechanics?

Statistical interpretation differs from other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, in that it does not make any assumptions about the underlying reality of quantum systems. Instead, it focuses solely on the mathematical equations that describe the behavior of these systems.

3. What is the role of measurement in statistical interpretation?

In statistical interpretation, measurement plays a crucial role in determining the probabilities of various outcomes. When a measurement is made, the quantum system "collapses" into one of its possible states, with the probability of each state determined by the equations of quantum mechanics.

4. How does statistical interpretation explain the uncertainty principle?

The uncertainty principle, which states that certain pairs of physical properties cannot be known simultaneously with infinite precision, is a fundamental aspect of statistical interpretation. It arises from the probabilistic nature of quantum systems and the limitations of measurement in determining their properties.

5. Can statistical interpretation be applied to macroscopic systems?

While statistical interpretation is primarily used to describe the behavior of subatomic particles, it can also be applied to macroscopic systems. However, the effects of quantum mechanics are typically negligible at larger scales, making statistical interpretation less relevant in these cases.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
9
Replies
309
Views
8K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
793
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
672
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
156
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
512
Back
Top