Statistics of charged beads in electric field

In summary: You can start finding the probabilities by dividing each of the Boltzmann factors by Z and then summing the probabilities for the aligned states and the probabilities for the anti-aligned states.In summary, a string of N beads connected by N-1 rigid rods of length l is considered in a one-dimensional system with rods only being aligned either up or down. The string is immersed in a fluid at temperature T and the first bead is fixed at the origin y=0. A constant electric field is applied in the positive y direction. The question asks for the average length of the string if only the last bead holds a charge q. The partition function and energy of the system are used to determine the probability of the rods being aligned with or against
  • #1
Beer-monster
296
0

Homework Statement



Consider a string of N beads connected by N-1 rigid rods of length l. The system is considered as one-dimensional with rods only being aligned either up or down. The string is immersed in a fluid at temperature T and first bead is fixed at the origin y=0. A constant electric field is applied in the positive y direction.

What is the average length of the string if only the last bead holds a charge q.


Homework Equations



[tex]\sum\frac{e^{-\beta E}}{Z} [/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a little unsure about how to consider the effects of the charged bead in the field.

My thoughts in general were to consider the rods in two states, either aligned with or against the field. If aligned with the field the energy is negative [itex]-eEl[/itex]. If aligned with the field the energy is positive [itex]+eEl[/itex]. By considering these states I hope to determine the probability of a rod being aligned with/against field and from that determine the expectation value of the length.

One one hand if only the end bead is charged only that bead will show a preferential alignment and the rest will be random.

On the other hand; if the Nth bead feels a force due to the applied field it will also apply a force to the N-1th bead, which will apply the force to the N-2th bead etc. In that way the work will be applied to all of the rods so the energy shift will apply to all beads.

Which is right? Or am I completely off-base?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For the partition function, you need an expression for the energy of the system for each possible state of the system. A state of the system is a specification of the orientations of the individual rods. The energy of the system is equal to the electrical potential energy of the charged bead and that’s determined by the charged bead’s y coordinate, yN.

If you knew the orientations of all the rods, how could you calculate yN? It might be helpful to introduce a variable for each rod to denote it’s orientation, say sk for the kth rod. Let sk = 1 or -1 for the rod being parallel or antiparallel to the field, respectively. Can you express yN in terms of the sk variables and the length of each rod?

How would you express the electrical potential energy of the system in terms of yN?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
If we define Sk as +/-1 depending on if the rods are aligned with the field the length of the string would be:

[tex] y_{N}=\sum_{N} S_{k}l [/tex] where l is the length of a rod.

In the absence of an initial coordinate for the Nth bead I would express the potential energy of due to the field as [itex] \epsilon = q_{N}Ey_{N} [/itex]

Thus the partition function per rod would be

[tex] Z = \sum^{+1}_{S_{k}=-1} e^{\beta q_{N}E\sum_{N} S_{k}l} [/tex]

Using this I can determine the probability and thus the average number of a rod being aligned with or against the field and sum to make the average length.
 
  • #4
Beer-monster said:
If we define Sk as +/-1 depending on if the rods are aligned with the field the length of the string would be:

[tex] y_{N}=\sum_{N} S_{k}l [/tex] where l is the length of a rod.
Yes. The sum is over k from 1 to N-1?
In the absence of an initial coordinate for the Nth bead I would express the potential energy of due to the field as [itex] \epsilon = q_{N}Ey_{N} [/itex]

The potential energy of a (positive) charge decreases as the charge moves in the direction of the field. So, the sign is not correct for the energy.
Thus the partition function per rod would be

[tex] Z = \sum^{+1}_{S_{k}=-1} e^{\beta q_{N}E\sum_{N} S_{k}l} [/tex]

Here, the sign of the argument of the exponential is correct!
Using this I can determine the probability and thus the average number of a rod being aligned with or against the field and sum to make the average length.

Yes.
 
Last edited:
  • #5




Your approach of considering the rods in two states, aligned with or against the field, is a good starting point. However, you also need to consider the interactions between the charged bead and the rest of the beads in the string.

First, let's consider the case where only the last bead is charged. In this scenario, the charged bead will experience a force in the positive y direction, but the rest of the beads will not be affected by the electric field. This means that the probability of a rod being aligned with or against the field will not change, and the average length of the string will remain the same as in the absence of the electric field.

Now, let's consider the case where all the beads in the string are charged. In this scenario, the charged beads will experience a force in the positive y direction, and they will also exert a force on the adjacent beads. This will lead to a stretching of the string, resulting in an increase in the average length of the string.

To determine the exact value of the average length, you will need to consider the interactions between the charged beads and the rest of the string, and also take into account the temperature of the fluid. This can be done using statistical mechanics and the equation you have provided:

\sum\frac{e^{-\beta E}}{Z}

Where E is the energy of the system, Z is the partition function, and \beta = 1/(kT) where k is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature.

Overall, your approach is on the right track, but you will need to consider the interactions between the charged beads and the rest of the string to determine the exact value of the average length.
 

Related to Statistics of charged beads in electric field

What is the purpose of studying the statistics of charged beads in electric field?

The purpose of studying the statistics of charged beads in electric field is to understand the behavior of charged particles in an electric field and how they interact with each other. This information is important in various fields such as physics, chemistry, and engineering.

How are the charged beads arranged in an electric field?

The charged beads are typically arranged in a line or a grid within the electric field. This allows for easier observation and analysis of their behavior and interactions.

What factors affect the movement of charged beads in an electric field?

The movement of charged beads in an electric field is affected by several factors such as the strength of the electric field, the charge of the beads, and the distance between the beads. Other factors such as the presence of other electrically charged objects in the vicinity can also influence their movement.

What statistical methods are used to analyze the data from experiments on charged beads in electric field?

Various statistical methods can be used to analyze the data from experiments on charged beads in electric field, such as mean, median, standard deviation, and regression analysis. These methods help to identify patterns and relationships in the data and make predictions about the behavior of the charged beads.

What are the applications of studying the statistics of charged beads in electric field?

The study of the statistics of charged beads in electric field has various applications, including the development of new technologies such as sensors, batteries, and electronic devices. It also helps in understanding natural phenomena such as lightning and the behavior of particles in space.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
273
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
646
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
962
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
425
Back
Top