Stirling numbers of first kind

In summary, The identity for Stirling numbers can be proven by working with unsigned Stirling numbers and using the identity $\left[{n\atop k}\right]=\left[{n-1\atop k-1}\right]+(n-1)\times\left[{n-1\atop k}\right]$. This can be easily proven by induction, using the identities $H_n^2=\left(H_{n-1}+1/n\right)^2$ and $H_n^{(2)}=H_{n-1}^{(2)}+1/n^2$. The simpler identity $\left[{n\atop k}\right]=(n-1)!\times H_{n
  • #1
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
1,561
0
HI folks , working on Stirling nums , how to prove ?

\(\displaystyle s(n,3)=\frac{1}{2}(-1)^{n-1}(n-1)!\left(H_{n-1}^2-H_{n-1}^{(2)}\right)
\)

where we define \(\displaystyle H_k^{(n)}= \sum_{m=1}^k \frac{1}{m^n}\)

I don't how to start (Bandit)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First, let us forget about the sign and work with unsigned Stirling numbers (so on the left you'd have $\left[{n\atop 3}\right]$, and on the right the same except that the factor $(-1)^{n-1}$ vanishes) . The result then will follow immediately.

Now, we have $\left[{n\atop 3}\right] = \left[{n-1\atop 2}\right] + (n-1)\times \left[{n-1\atop 3}\right]$

And here note that $\left[{n\atop 2}\right] = (n-1)! \times H_{n-1}$, a simpler identity. $(*)$

Having the identities above, try proving your identity (in an unsigned version) by induction. Don't forget that you have $H_n^2 = \left(H_{n-1}+1/n\right)^2$ and $H_n^{(2)} = H_{n-1}^{(2)} + 1/n^2$.

$(*)$ This one has a nicer combinatorial intepretation. First remember that $\left[{n\atop k}\right]$ counts the number of permutations having exactly $k$ cycles in its disjoint cycle decomposition.
Now $(n-1)\times H_{n-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(n-1)!}{k}$. Here interpret $(n-1)!$ as taking the permutations that fix $n$. Then, for each $k$, let $\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_{n-1},\pi_n=n$ translate into having the cycles $\pi_1\to \ldots \pi_k\to \pi_1$ and $\pi_{k+1}\to \ldots \to \pi_n\to \pi_{k+1}$. Here note that we are overcounting $k$ times (since $\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_k$ ; $\pi_2,\ldots,\pi_k,\pi_1$ ; ... ; $\pi_k,\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_{k-1}$ result int he same cycle structure, we don't have the same problem with the other cycle since $n$ is fixed), hence the division by $k$.
 

1. What are Stirling numbers of first kind?

Stirling numbers of first kind, denoted as s(n, k), are combinatorial numbers that represent the number of ways to partition a set of n elements into k non-empty cycles. They are named after James Stirling, a Scottish mathematician who first studied them in the 18th century.

2. How are Stirling numbers of first kind calculated?

Stirling numbers of first kind can be calculated using a recursive formula: s(n, k) = (n-1)s(n-1, k) + s(n-1, k-1), with the initial values s(0,0) = 1 and s(n, 0) = 0 for n > 0. Alternatively, they can also be calculated using generating functions or through a triangular array known as the Stirling triangle.

3. What is the significance of Stirling numbers of first kind?

Stirling numbers of first kind have many important applications in combinatorics, number theory, and other areas of mathematics. They can be used to solve problems involving permutations, partitions, and Bell numbers. They also have connections to other mathematical concepts such as the Bell polynomials and the Eulerian numbers.

4. Can Stirling numbers of first kind be negative?

No, Stirling numbers of first kind are always non-negative integers. This is because they represent the number of ways to partition a set, which cannot be negative or fractional.

5. How are Stirling numbers of first kind related to Stirling numbers of second kind?

Stirling numbers of first kind and Stirling numbers of second kind are related through a formula known as the inversion formula: s(n, k) = (-1)^{n-k}s(n-1, k) + s(n-1, k-1). They also have a combinatorial interpretation in terms of permutations and combinations, respectively. Additionally, they satisfy a duality property, where the Stirling triangle for one type of numbers is the transpose of the Stirling triangle for the other type of numbers.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
929
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
869
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
741
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
392
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top